Printing machinery for textiles manufacturing · Colorado

3D Systems (Titan) - Colorado Springs

Colorado Springs, CO · ~41 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

3D Systems (Titan) - Colorado Springs runs at 59% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Printing machinery for textiles manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

3D Systems (Titan) - Colorado Springs: 1.9 TCR = 59% of Printing machinery for textiles manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

3D Systems (Titan) - Colorado Springs safety composite

3D Systems (Titan) - Colorado Springs scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

67/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.94 per 100 workers

Safer than 68% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.6

2022→2024

3D Systems (Titan) - Colorado Springs injury rate improved

3D Systems (Titan) - Colorado Springs's TCR fell 3.6 from 3.6 in 2022 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 3.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=3.6 · 2023=2.2 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333249 · Colorado Springs, CO AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 1.9 · 59% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #3/4
  • PHOTO Schleuniger, Inc.
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~41 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Schleuniger, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Colorado employers → · Look up another →

3D Systems (Titan) - Colorado Springs in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows 3D Systems (Titan) - Colorado Springs averages 1.9 TCR (59% of the Printing machinery for textiles manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

3D Systems (Titan) - Colorado Springs TCR series: 2022=3.6 · 2023=2.2 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where 3D Systems (Titan) - Colorado Springs falls in its industry

448 Printing machinery for textile establishments

Safer than 68% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Colorado alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 4 Printing machinery for textile employers in Colorado.

3D Systems (Titan) - Colorado Springs (41 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 70 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate 3D Systems (Titan) - Colorado Springs
3D Systems (Titan) - Colorado Springs (41 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 70 employees and a TCR of 3.0

3D Systems (Titan) - Colorado Springs has fewer employees than the Printing machinery for textiles manufact median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 2.2 2.2 1 0 0
2022 3.6 3.6 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333249 · CO · Colorado Springs

448 Printing machinery for textiles manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,007 rated employers in Colorado with headcount on file · 832 employers in Colorado Springs, CO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Schleuniger, Inc. 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wabash MPI/Carver, Inc. 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR United Plastics Group, LLC 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Suburban Tool & Die Co., Inc. 1.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Colorado Beef 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE Gilcrest Feedlot 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE TORTUGA AGRICULTURAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE Montrose Maintenance Center 41 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Colorado Hospital Memorial Central 3,102 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - DEN4 2,948 FTE
CITY-NEAR Penrose Hospital 2,841 FTE
CITY-NEAR 05070001-050701 PENROSE HOSPITAL 2,391 FTE
NAT-TCR Kimpton Marlowe Hotel 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Atlanta Regional Office 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Therm-Con 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Birmingham Hot Metal Coatings 1.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Gold's Gym DC Metro Bailey's Crossroads 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE Residential Living Center 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hacienda Harvesting 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ronald Franks Construction Company, LLC 41 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.