General warehousing and storage · South Carolina

40172 - Capstone Michelin Us1 Greenville Sc

Greenville, SC · ~76 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
2.4
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

40172 - Capstone Michelin Us1 Greenville Sc runs at 41% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical General warehousing and storage workplace, earning a grade A.

40172 - Capstone Michelin Us1 Greenville Sc: 2.4 TCR = 41% of General warehousing and storage BLS 5.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

40172 - Capstone Michelin Us1 Greenville Sc safety composite

40172 - Capstone Michelin Us1 Greenville Sc scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 66% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 34%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

51/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.35 per 100 workers

Safer than 66% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.56 per 100 workers

Safer than 34% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

40172 - Capstone Michelin Us1 Greenville Sc: 1.1 → 3.6 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 3.6 TCR · DART/TCR 1.51× in 2019

40172 - Capstone Michelin Us1 Greenville Sc's TCR rose 2.4 from 1.1 in 2018 to 3.6 in 2019. In 2019, DART was 1.51× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493110 · Greenville, SC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 2.4 · 41% of ind

  • DART 3.6 DART
  • RANK #60/160
  • PHOTO Building 45
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~76 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Building 45 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

40172 - Capstone Michelin Us1 Greenville Sc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows 40172 - Capstone Michelin Us1 Greenville Sc averages 2.4 TCR (41% of the General warehousing and storage BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-09-26

40172 - Capstone Michelin Us1 Greenville Sc TCR series: 2018=1.1 · 2019=3.6 · BLS 5.8

Where 40172 - Capstone Michelin Us1 Greenville Sc falls in its industry

9,477 General warehousing and storag establishments

Safer than 66% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #60 safest of 160 General warehousing and storag employers in South Carolina.

40172 - Capstone Michelin Us1 Greenville Sc (76 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate 40172 - Capstone Michelin Us1 Greenville Sc
40172 - Capstone Michelin Us1 Greenville Sc (76 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5

40172 - Capstone Michelin Us1 Greenville Sc has fewer employees than the General warehousing and storage median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 3.6 3.6 4 0 0
2018 1.1 1.1 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493110 · SC · Greenville

9,477 General warehousing and storage employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 573 employers in Greenville, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Building 45 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Clorox Redlands Daniel Garcia (MRU1040) 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mars Joliet WHS 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR 175 Bearfoot Road Northboro MA 2.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE JEDBURG SC (SUMMERVILLE) 76 FTE
STATE-SIZE MORNINGSIDE MIDDLE 76 FTE
STATE-SIZE 4795-EA-CHS-CHARLESTON-EAGLE ACS 76 FTE
STATE-SIZE Carolinian Resort (Oceana Resort) 76 FTE
CITY-NEAR GREENVILLE MEMORIAL MED CAMPUS 6,132 FTE
CITY-NEAR St Francis Health System 3,395 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gas Power Systems : Greenville, SC, USA 2,971 FTE
CITY-NEAR GSC : Greenville, SC, USA 2,673 FTE
NAT-TCR Community & Economic Development 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Fort Wayne NE Service Center 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Hazard Service Center 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Tops 272 2.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Woodview Care and Rehabilitation 76 FTE
NAT-SIZE 4054-Abs 0016 1059 76 FTE
NAT-SIZE City Treasurer 76 FTE
NAT-SIZE 4054-Abs 0026 1461 76 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.