Addition, alteration and renovation for-sale builders, commercial and institutional building · California

4020189 - China Lake South Airfield

Ridgecrest, CA · ~78 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.9
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

4020189 - China Lake South Airfield runs at 66% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Addition, alteration and renovation for-sale builders, commercial and institutional building workplace, earning a grade B.

4020189 - China Lake South Airfield: 1.9 TCR = 66% of Addition, alteration and renovation for-sale builders, commercial and institutional building BLS 2.9 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

4020189 - China Lake South Airfield safety composite

4020189 - China Lake South Airfield scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 73% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

61/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.91 per 100 workers

Safer than 57% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.7

2021→2024

4020189 - China Lake South Airfield injury rate improved

4020189 - China Lake South Airfield's TCR fell 2.7 from 2.7 in 2021 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 3.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=2.7 · 2022=3.8 · 2023=1.2 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236220 · Ridgecrest, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 1.9 · 66% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #195/486
  • PHOTO Bast Hatfield Constr…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~78 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Bast Hatfield Construction (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

4020189 - China Lake South Airfield in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows 4020189 - China Lake South Airfield averages 1.9 TCR (66% of the Addition, alteration and renovation for-sale builders, commercial and institutional building BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

4020189 - China Lake South Airfield TCR series: 2021=2.7 · 2022=3.8 · 2023=1.2 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.9

Where 4020189 - China Lake South Airfield falls in its industry

4,692 Addition, alteration and renov establishments

Safer than 57% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #195 safest of 486 Addition, alteration and renov employers in California.

4020189 - China Lake South Airfield (78 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate 4020189 - China Lake South Airfield
4020189 - China Lake South Airfield (78 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3

4020189 - China Lake South Airfield has more employees than the Addition, alteration and renovation for- median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 1.2 1.2 1 0 0
2022 3.8 2.8 4 0 0
2021 2.7 1.4 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236220 · CA · Ridgecrest

4,692 Addition, alteration and renovation for-sale builders, commercial and institutional building employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 29 employers in Ridgecrest, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Bast Hatfield Construction 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kirk Bros Co, Inc. 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Burlington Redlands #517 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Windsor Contracting LLC 1.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE California Endive Farms 78 FTE
STATE-SIZE VF - Napa 78 FTE
STATE-SIZE Russell Harris Farms 78 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hadley Date Gardens, Inc. 78 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ridgecrest Regional Hospital 731 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1600 347 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 1600 346 FTE
CITY-NEAR Desert Area Resources and Training 107 FTE
NAT-TCR Bay Climate Control & Refrigeration, LLC 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Grande Communications Networks, LLC-Waco 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR SCEC - Ocala 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR United States Bulletproofing, Inc 1.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Superior Plastics Inc 78 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sherwood Village 78 FTE
NAT-SIZE Grand Cane 78 FTE
NAT-SIZE Casa Grande AZ Truss 78 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.