General warehousing and storage · Georgia

40292 Capstone - Gfs Douglasville Ga

Lithia Springs, GA · ~30 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
3.7
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

40292 Capstone - Gfs Douglasville Ga runs at 63% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical General warehousing and storage workplace, earning a grade B.

40292 Capstone - Gfs Douglasville Ga: 3.7 TCR = 63% of General warehousing and storage BLS 5.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

40292 Capstone - Gfs Douglasville Ga safety composite

40292 Capstone - Gfs Douglasville Ga scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 86% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 47%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

61/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.66 per 100 workers

Safer than 47% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

40292 Capstone - Gfs Douglasville Ga held a steady TCR band

40292 Capstone - Gfs Douglasville Ga's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2020 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 14.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=0.0 · 2021=4.1 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=14.2 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493110 · Lithia Springs, GA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 3.7 · 63% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #325/506
  • PHOTO Amazon.com Services …
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~30 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Amazon.com Services LLC - PHX6 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

40292 Capstone - Gfs Douglasville Ga in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows 40292 Capstone - Gfs Douglasville Ga averages 3.7 TCR (63% of the General warehousing and storage BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

40292 Capstone - Gfs Douglasville Ga TCR series: 2020=0 · 2021=4.1 · 2022=0 · 2023=14.2 · 2024=0 · BLS 5.8

Where 40292 Capstone - Gfs Douglasville Ga falls in its industry

9,477 General warehousing and storag establishments

Safer than 47% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #325 safest of 506 General warehousing and storag employers in Georgia.

40292 Capstone - Gfs Douglasville Ga (30 employees, TCR 3.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate 40292 Capstone - Gfs Douglasville Ga
40292 Capstone - Gfs Douglasville Ga (30 employees, TCR 3.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5

40292 Capstone - Gfs Douglasville Ga has fewer employees than the General warehousing and storage median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 14.2 14.2 4 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 4.1 4.1 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493110 · GA · Lithia Springs

9,477 General warehousing and storage employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 122 employers in Lithia Springs, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Amazon.com Services LLC - PHX6 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR 5030 WINCHESTER RDC 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR GOOD SMILE CONNECT, LLC 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Building 17 3.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Forsyth Hatchery 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Coffee Cotton Gin Co., Inc 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Albany Green Energy 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Americus Operating 1020 Southerfield Road Americus GA 30 FTE
CITY-NEAR Silver Line Building Products 897 FTE
CITY-NEAR Home Chef - Skyview 673 FTE
CITY-NEAR GA-LITHI02 671 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lithia Springs, GA - Sydney Ct 655 FTE
NAT-TCR The Palmettos of Parklane, LLC 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Focused Cre at Orange 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Jasper Weller, LLC - DBA Weller Truck Parts (Grandville) 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Moab 3.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE ME022MEM 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE SEA-ITP 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Richmond Marine Terminal 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wag Services, Inc. 30 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.