Cut Stock, Resawing Lumber, and Planing · Illinois

4208 - Plano Board Plant

Plano, IL · ~59 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
10.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

4208 - Plano Board Plant runs at 306% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Cut Stock, Resawing Lumber, and Planing workplace, earning a grade F.

4208 - Plano Board Plant: 10.1 TCR = 306% of Cut Stock, Resawing Lumber, and Planing BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

4208 - Plano Board Plant safety composite

4208 - Plano Board Plant scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 17%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

49/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.09 per 100 workers

Safer than 17% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.1

2018→2024

4208 - Plano Board Plant injury rate improved

4208 - Plano Board Plant's TCR fell 3.1 from 9.3 in 2018 to 6.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 14.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=9.3 · 2019=14.7 · 2020=13.8 · 2021=9.8 · 2022=12.7 · 2023=4.3 · 2024=6.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 321912 · Plano, IL ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 10.1 · 306% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #3/4
  • PHOTO Real Wood Products
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 37 inj
  • SIZE ~59 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Real Wood Products (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Illinois employers → · Look up another →

4208 - Plano Board Plant in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows 4208 - Plano Board Plant averages 10.1 TCR (306% of the Cut Stock, Resawing Lumber, and Planing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

4208 - Plano Board Plant TCR series: 2018=9.3 · 2019=14.7 · 2020=13.8 · 2021=9.8 · 2022=12.7 · 2023=4.3 · 2024=6.2 · BLS 3.3

Where 4208 - Plano Board Plant falls in its industry

178 Cut Stock, Resawing Lumber, an establishments

Safer than 17% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Illinois alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 4 Cut Stock, Resawing Lumber, an employers in Illinois.

4208 - Plano Board Plant (59 employees, TCR 10.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 5.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate 4208 - Plano Board Plant
4208 - Plano Board Plant (59 employees, TCR 10.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 5.1

4208 - Plano Board Plant has more employees than the Cut Stock, Resawing Lumber, and Planing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 6.2 0.0 3 0 0
2023 4.3 2.1 2 0 0
2022 12.7 4.2 6 0 0
2021 9.8 2.0 5 0 0
2020 13.8 3.4 8 0 0
2019 14.7 7.3 8 0 0
2018 9.3 5.6 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

321912 · IL · Plano

178 Cut Stock, Resawing Lumber, and Planing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,804 rated employers in Illinois with headcount on file · 30 employers in Plano, IL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Real Wood Products 10.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Patrick Lumber Manufacturing 10.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Summit Cedar Reman, LLC 10.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR L & L Lumber Remanufacturing 10.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Cornbelt Fire Protection District 59 FTE
STATE-SIZE Exelon Nuclear Services & Training Center (STC) 59 FTE
STATE-SIZE AMEREN ILLINOIS - Electric Field Meter Services 59 FTE
STATE-SIZE 0G5 - Gas Tech - Engineering 59 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 1003 388 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1003 325 FTE
CITY-NEAR PLANO DC BLDG 221 - 3239 160 FTE
CITY-NEAR PLANO DC BLDG 223 - 3239 128 FTE
NAT-TCR RYCO Contracting LLC 10.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Upstate Farms Dairy LLC 10.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Royal Fresh Cuts Building 3600 10.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Big R of Conifer, LLC. 10.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE 4060 - Eau Claire Countertops 59 FTE
NAT-SIZE Huron D.C. 59 FTE
NAT-SIZE Providers Logistics LLC 59 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lakeside Book Company - Indy East 59 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.