General Warehousing and Storage · Wisconsin

4718/3801 - Iron Ridge Crossdocks

Iron Ridge, WI · ~64 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
8.5
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

4718/3801 - Iron Ridge Crossdocks runs at 147% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical General Warehousing and Storage workplace, earning a grade D.

4718/3801 - Iron Ridge Crossdocks: 8.5 TCR = 147% of General Warehousing and Storage BLS 5.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

4718/3801 - Iron Ridge Crossdocks safety composite

4718/3801 - Iron Ridge Crossdocks scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 13%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

35/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 8.54 per 100 workers

Safer than 13% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.12 per 100 workers

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.6

2018→2023

4718/3801 - Iron Ridge Crossdocks injury rate improved

4718/3801 - Iron Ridge Crossdocks's TCR fell 2.6 from 6.9 in 2018 to 4.2 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2019 at 14.2 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.25× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=6.9 · 2019=14.2 · 2020=11.0 · 2021=7.8 · 2022=7.2 · 2023=4.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493110 · Iron Ridge, WI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 8.5 · 147% of ind

  • DART 2.1 DART
  • RANK #155/195
  • PHOTO Norfolk Iron & Metal…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 30 inj
  • SIZE ~64 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Norfolk Iron & Metal Co- Durant (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

4718/3801 - Iron Ridge Crossdocks in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows 4718/3801 - Iron Ridge Crossdocks averages 8.5 TCR (147% of the General Warehousing and Storage BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

4718/3801 - Iron Ridge Crossdocks TCR series: 2018=6.9 · 2019=14.2 · 2020=11 · 2021=7.8 · 2022=7.2 · 2023=4.2 · BLS 5.8

Where 4718/3801 - Iron Ridge Crossdocks falls in its industry

9,477 General Warehousing and Storag establishments

Safer than 13% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #155 safest of 195 General Warehousing and Storag employers in Wisconsin.

4718/3801 - Iron Ridge Crossdocks (64 employees, TCR 8.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate 4718/3801 - Iron Ridge Crossdocks
4718/3801 - Iron Ridge Crossdocks (64 employees, TCR 8.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5

4718/3801 - Iron Ridge Crossdocks has fewer employees than the General Warehousing and Storage median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 4.2 2.1 2 0 0
2022 7.2 1.8 4 0 0
2021 7.8 3.9 4 0 0
2020 11.0 3.1 7 0 0
2019 14.2 1.6 9 0 0
2018 6.9 3.4 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493110 · WI · Iron Ridge

9,477 General Warehousing and Storage employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 15 employers in Iron Ridge, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Norfolk Iron & Metal Co- Durant 8.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR 3841 - Suffolk UDC 8.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR AMZL : DPX5 8.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR IKEA Savannah DC 8.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Tomah, WI Receiving Station 64 FTE
STATE-SIZE Van's Lumber & Custom Builders INc. 64 FTE
STATE-SIZE PDC Facilities Inc. 64 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pretec Directional Drilling, LLC 64 FTE
CITY-NEAR PS Seasoning & Spices, Inc. 120 FTE
CITY-NEAR X-Cel Tooling, Inc. 58 FTE
CITY-NEAR API Heat Transfer - Iron Ridge 41 FTE
CITY-NEAR Wondra Construction Inc 39 FTE
NAT-TCR Cass County - Michigan Ave 8.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Chico Plant 8.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Ingomar Packing Company 8.5 TCR
NAT-TCR North Broward Prep* 8.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Skywater 64 FTE
NAT-SIZE NC- High Point 64 FTE
NAT-SIZE Land N' Sea - Clinton, MI 64 FTE
NAT-SIZE Woodlands Service Center 64 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.