Scheduled passenger air transportation · California

4795-Ea-Lax-Los Angeles-Lax-Trm1

Los Angeles, CA · ~793 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
4.8
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

4795-Ea-Lax-Los Angeles-Lax-Trm1 runs at 107% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Scheduled passenger air transportation workplace, earning a grade C.

4795-Ea-Lax-Los Angeles-Lax-Trm1: 4.8 TCR = 107% of Scheduled passenger air transportation BLS 4.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

4795-Ea-Lax-Los Angeles-Lax-Trm1 safety composite

4795-Ea-Lax-Los Angeles-Lax-Trm1 scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 60% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 41%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

51/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 4.83 per 100 workers

Safer than 60% of industry peers

DART rate
D 5.65 per 100 workers

Safer than 41% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

4795-Ea-Lax-Los Angeles-Lax-Trm1: 1.4 → 6.4 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 6.6 TCR · DART/TCR 1.17× in 2022

4795-Ea-Lax-Los Angeles-Lax-Trm1's TCR rose 5.0 from 1.4 in 2020 to 6.4 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2021 at 6.6 TCR. In 2022, DART was 1.17× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 481111 · Los Angeles, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 4.8 · 107% of ind

  • DART 5.7 DART
  • RANK #61/177
  • PHOTO Denver CS Alaska
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 108 inj
  • SIZE ~793 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Denver CS Alaska (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

4795-Ea-Lax-Los Angeles-Lax-Trm1 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows 4795-Ea-Lax-Los Angeles-Lax-Trm1 averages 4.8 TCR (107% of the Scheduled passenger air transportation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

4795-Ea-Lax-Los Angeles-Lax-Trm1 TCR series: 2020=1.4 · 2021=6.6 · 2022=6.4 · BLS 4.5

Where 4795-Ea-Lax-Los Angeles-Lax-Trm1 falls in its industry

1,568 Scheduled passenger air transp establishments

Safer than 60% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #61 safest of 177 Scheduled passenger air transp employers in California.

4795-Ea-Lax-Los Angeles-Lax-Trm1 (793 employees, TCR 4.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 6.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate 4795-Ea-Lax-Los Angeles-Lax-Trm1
4795-Ea-Lax-Los Angeles-Lax-Trm1 (793 employees, TCR 4.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 6.1

4795-Ea-Lax-Los Angeles-Lax-Trm1 has more employees than the Scheduled passenger air transportation median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 6.4 5.7 56 3 0
2021 6.6 5.4 48 8 0
2020 1.4 1.4 4 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

481111 · CA · Los Angeles

1,568 Scheduled passenger air transportation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 2,064 employers in Los Angeles, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Denver CS Alaska 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR OAK - Maintenance 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Santa Ana Alaska 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR 4795-EA-SAV-SAVANNAH-SAV-TRML 4.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Pacific Harvest, Inc. 793 FTE
STATE-SIZE California Department of Transportation Facility 446 793 FTE
STATE-SIZE California Department of Transportation Facility 478 793 FTE
STATE-SIZE 430-DC006 793 FTE
CITY-NEAR Live Nation Worldwide, Inc. 50,317 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC Los Angeles 40,333 FTE
CITY-NEAR LADWP 11,717 FTE
CITY-NEAR Los Angeles Department of Water and Power 10,346 FTE
NAT-TCR Northern Utah Rehabilitation Hospital, LLC 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Cliffs At Peace Canyon 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Meadow Brook Medical Care Facility 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR 240136-Amherst Po 4.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Rubbermaid 793 FTE
NAT-SIZE J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc 793 FTE
NAT-SIZE Grant Street 793 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rayonier Advanced Materials - Jesup Plant 793 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.