Scheduled Passenger Air Transportation · Virginia

4795-PD-CHO-CHARLOTTESVILLE-PD

Charlottesville, VA · ~41 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
15.9
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

4795-PD-CHO-CHARLOTTESVILLE-PD runs at 353% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Scheduled Passenger Air Transportation workplace, earning a grade F.

4795-PD-CHO-CHARLOTTESVILLE-PD: 15.9 TCR = 353% of Scheduled Passenger Air Transportation BLS 4.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

4795-PD-CHO-CHARLOTTESVILLE-PD safety composite

4795-PD-CHO-CHARLOTTESVILLE-PD scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 11%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

23/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 15.89 per 100 workers

Safer than 11% of industry peers

DART rate
F 11.67 per 100 workers

Safer than 17% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

4795-PD-CHO-CHARLOTTESVILLE-PD: 12.4 → 17.5 TCR

Peak year 2017 @ 17.8 TCR · DART/TCR 0.73× in 2018

4795-PD-CHO-CHARLOTTESVILLE-PD's TCR rose 5.1 from 12.4 in 2016 to 17.5 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2017 at 17.8 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0.73× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 481111 · Charlottesville, VA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 15.9 · 353% of ind

  • DART 11.7 DART
  • RANK #52/57
  • PHOTO 4795-EA-SHV-SHREVEPO…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 17 inj
  • SIZE ~41 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 4795-EA-SHV-SHREVEPORT-SHV-TRML (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Virginia employers → · Look up another →

4795-PD-CHO-CHARLOTTESVILLE-PD in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows 4795-PD-CHO-CHARLOTTESVILLE-PD averages 15.9 TCR (353% of the Scheduled Passenger Air Transportation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

4795-PD-CHO-CHARLOTTESVILLE-PD TCR series: 2016=12.4 · 2017=17.8 · 2018=17.5 · BLS 4.5

Where 4795-PD-CHO-CHARLOTTESVILLE-PD falls in its industry

1,568 Scheduled Passenger Air Transp establishments

Safer than 11% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Virginia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #52 safest of 57 Scheduled Passenger Air Transp employers in Virginia.

4795-PD-CHO-CHARLOTTESVILLE-PD (41 employees, TCR 15.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 6.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate 4795-PD-CHO-CHARLOTTESVILLE-PD
4795-PD-CHO-CHARLOTTESVILLE-PD (41 employees, TCR 15.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 6.1

4795-PD-CHO-CHARLOTTESVILLE-PD has fewer employees than the Scheduled Passenger Air Transportation median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 17.5 11.7 6 0 0
2017 17.8 15.3 7 0 0
2016 12.4 12.4 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

481111 · VA · Charlottesville

1,568 Scheduled Passenger Air Transportation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,673 rated employers in Virginia with headcount on file · 269 employers in Charlottesville, VA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 4795-EA-SHV-SHREVEPORT-SHV-TRML 15.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR PIT-GROUND OPS 15.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR ATL-INFLIGHT 15.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR 4795-EA-ORD-CHICAGO - OHARE-EAGLE FLIGHT SERVICE 16.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Fort Bragg 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE Public Works- Facilities 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hampton Roads Contracting, Inc. 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE International Paper - Franklin 41 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Virginia 11,898 FTE
CITY-NEAR University Of Virginia (209) Health System 10,653 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Virginia Medical Center 8,738 FTE
CITY-NEAR UVA Medical Center 7,268 FTE
NAT-TCR Ruston (Larus) 15.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Oak Steakhouse LLC 15.9 TCR
NAT-TCR MBK - The Commons at Dallas Ranch 15.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Darway Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center 15.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Metl-Span Mattoon 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE dd's DISCOUNTS Store 5071 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE dd's DISCOUNTS Store 5125 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ft Wayne Branch 41 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.