Scheduled Passenger Air Transportation · North Carolina

4795-PD-CLT-CHARLOTTE-CLT-PDMT

Charlotte, NC · ~2,256 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
10.0
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
1
Fatality
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

4795-PD-CLT-CHARLOTTE-CLT-PDMT runs at 222% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Scheduled Passenger Air Transportation workplace, earning a grade F.

4795-PD-CLT-CHARLOTTE-CLT-PDMT: 10.0 TCR = 222% of Scheduled Passenger Air Transportation BLS 4.5 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

4795-PD-CLT-CHARLOTTE-CLT-PDMT safety composite

4795-PD-CLT-CHARLOTTE-CLT-PDMT scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 45% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 0%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

27/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10 per 100 workers

Safer than 28% of industry peers

DART rate
D 4.99 per 100 workers

Safer than 45% of industry peers

Fatalities
F 1

Safer than 0% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.4

2019→2022

4795-PD-CLT-CHARLOTTE-CLT-PDMT injury rate improved

4795-PD-CLT-CHARLOTTE-CLT-PDMT's TCR fell 2.4 from 10.5 in 2019 to 8.1 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2021 at 13.1 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.5× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=10.5 · 2020=8.3 · 2021=13.1 · 2022=8.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 481111 · Charlotte, NC ABOVE-IND · LARGE

Grade F · TCR 10.0 · 222% of ind

  • DART 5.0 DART
  • RANK #35/46
  • PHOTO OAK - Inflight
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 602 inj
  • SIZE ~2,256 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: OAK - Inflight (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

4795-PD-CLT-CHARLOTTE-CLT-PDMT in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows 4795-PD-CLT-CHARLOTTE-CLT-PDMT averages 10.0 TCR (222% of the Scheduled Passenger Air Transportation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

4795-PD-CLT-CHARLOTTE-CLT-PDMT TCR series: 2019=10.5 · 2020=8.3 · 2021=13.1 · 2022=8.1 · BLS 4.5

Where 4795-PD-CLT-CHARLOTTE-CLT-PDMT falls in its industry

1,568 Scheduled Passenger Air Transp establishments

Safer than 28% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #35 safest of 46 Scheduled Passenger Air Transp employers in North Carolina.

4795-PD-CLT-CHARLOTTE-CLT-PDMT (2,256 employees, TCR 10.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 6.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate 4795-PD-CLT-CHARLOTTE-CLT-PDMT
4795-PD-CLT-CHARLOTTE-CLT-PDMT (2,256 employees, TCR 10.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 6.1

4795-PD-CLT-CHARLOTTE-CLT-PDMT has more employees than the Scheduled Passenger Air Transportation median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 8.1 5.0 138 5 0
2021 13.1 8.0 157 13 0
2020 8.3 6.7 116 14 0
2019 10.5 9.0 191 13 1

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

481111 · NC · Charlotte

1,568 Scheduled Passenger Air Transportation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 2,058 employers in Charlotte, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR OAK - Inflight 10.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR 4795-PD-MGM-MONTGOMERY-PD 10.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR OAK-INFLIGHT 10.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sacramento Horizon 10.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Charlotte 2,300 FTE
STATE-SIZE Duke Regional Hospital 2,209 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wilkesboro Fresh Plant 2,164 FTE
STATE-SIZE SMB 2,353 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1101-Carolinas Medical Center (1101) 8,444 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0001-Carolinas Medical Center 8,032 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4795-AA-CLT-CHARLOTTE-CLT-TRML 7,295 FTE
CITY-NEAR Novant Health Presbyterian Medical Center 4,973 FTE
NAT-TCR 4054-ABS-0017-0016-03932 10.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 6962-ABS-0029-0028-00601 10.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 382097-Day-West Carrollton Br 10.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 189396-Waukee Po 10.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE GHQ-Global Headquaters 2,256 FTE
NAT-SIZE URBN Home Office 2,256 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians 2,256 FTE
NAT-SIZE Amazon.com Services LLC - PHX6 2,257 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.