Vocational Rehabilitation Services · California

482506 106305_ontario Bmp_idd Day Pgm Periodic

Ontario, CA · ~44 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.2
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

482506 106305_ontario Bmp_idd Day Pgm Periodic runs at 58% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Vocational Rehabilitation Services workplace, earning a grade B.

482506 106305_ontario Bmp_idd Day Pgm Periodic: 2.2 TCR = 58% of Vocational Rehabilitation Services BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

482506 106305_ontario Bmp_idd Day Pgm Periodic safety composite

482506 106305_ontario Bmp_idd Day Pgm Periodic scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

71/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 2.2 per 100 workers

Safer than 77% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.4

2023→2024

482506 106305_ontario Bmp_idd Day Pgm Periodic injury rate improved

482506 106305_ontario Bmp_idd Day Pgm Periodic's TCR fell 4.4 from 4.4 in 2023 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 4.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2023=4.4 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 624310 · Ontario, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.2 · 58% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #31/141
  • PHOTO FD CIF
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~44 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: FD CIF (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

482506 106305_ontario Bmp_idd Day Pgm Periodic in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows 482506 106305_ontario Bmp_idd Day Pgm Periodic averages 2.2 TCR (58% of the Vocational Rehabilitation Services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

482506 106305_ontario Bmp_idd Day Pgm Periodic TCR series: 2023=4.4 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.8

Where 482506 106305_ontario Bmp_idd Day Pgm Periodic falls in its industry

1,455 Vocational Rehabilitation Serv establishments

Safer than 77% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #31 safest of 141 Vocational Rehabilitation Serv employers in California.

482506 106305_ontario Bmp_idd Day Pgm Periodic (44 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 4.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate 482506 106305_ontario Bmp_idd Day Pgm Periodic
482506 106305_ontario Bmp_idd Day Pgm Periodic (44 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 4.6

482506 106305_ontario Bmp_idd Day Pgm Periodic has fewer employees than the Vocational Rehabilitation Services median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 4.4 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

624310 · CA · Ontario

1,455 Vocational Rehabilitation Services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 599 employers in Ontario, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR FD CIF 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Human Technologies Warehousing and Distribution 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR RWS NC RALEIGH CAP AREA RALEIGH 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR AWRC-Richmond 2.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Firebaugh 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE Boutonnet Farms 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE Central Coast Vineyards 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE FESTIVAL FARMS 44 FTE
CITY-NEAR Prime Healthcare Services Inc. Location: St. Mary's, Passaic LLC 46-3499370 (HP29) 10,997 FTE
CITY-NEAR CAONA - ONTARIO HUB 4,372 FTE
CITY-NEAR ONTARIO HUB (CAONA) 3,354 FTE
CITY-NEAR Atlantic Solutions Group Inc, Inc. DBA Empire Workforce Solutions 3,240 FTE
NAT-TCR Northland Environmental LLC 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Woodbury Supply Company Inc - Dayville 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Anheuser-Busch LLC 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Usc - Hammonton 2.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE STR0379 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE STR0341 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE STR0311 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE STR0085 44 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.