Mail and Parcel Delivery · Texas

483251-Fwt-North Carrier Anx

Fort Worth, TX · ~198 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
11.8
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

483251-Fwt-North Carrier Anx runs at 263% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Mail and Parcel Delivery workplace, earning a grade F.

483251-Fwt-North Carrier Anx: 11.8 TCR = 263% of Mail and Parcel Delivery BLS 4.5 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

483251-Fwt-North Carrier Anx safety composite

483251-Fwt-North Carrier Anx scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 10%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

22/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 11.83 per 100 workers

Safer than 14% of industry peers

DART rate
F 14.59 per 100 workers

Safer than 10% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.7

2017→2022

483251-Fwt-North Carrier Anx injury rate improved

483251-Fwt-North Carrier Anx's TCR fell 0.7 from 15.3 in 2017 to 14.6 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2017 at 15.3 TCR. In 2022, DART was 1.23× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=15.3 · 2018=14.9 · 2019=11.5 · 2020=7.8 · 2021=6.9 · 2022=14.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 491110 · Fort Worth, TX ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 11.8 · 263% of ind

  • DART 14.6 DART
  • RANK #865/959
  • PHOTO 240055-BOS-CHELSEA C…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 103 inj
  • SIZE ~198 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 240055-BOS-CHELSEA CARRIER ANNEX (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

483251-Fwt-North Carrier Anx in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows 483251-Fwt-North Carrier Anx averages 11.8 TCR (263% of the Mail and Parcel Delivery BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

483251-Fwt-North Carrier Anx TCR series: 2017=15.3 · 2018=14.9 · 2019=11.5 · 2020=7.8 · 2021=6.9 · 2022=14.6 · BLS 4.5

Where 483251-Fwt-North Carrier Anx falls in its industry

13,818 Mail and Parcel Delivery establishments

Safer than 14% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #865 safest of 959 Mail and Parcel Delivery employers in Texas.

483251-Fwt-North Carrier Anx (198 employees, TCR 11.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 51 employees and a TCR of 6.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate 483251-Fwt-North Carrier Anx
483251-Fwt-North Carrier Anx (198 employees, TCR 11.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 51 employees and a TCR of 6.8

483251-Fwt-North Carrier Anx has more employees than the Mail and Parcel Delivery median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 14.6 14.6 12 17 0
2021 6.9 6.4 11 3 0
2020 7.8 7.8 14 1 0
2019 11.5 10.9 19 1 0
2018 14.9 14.4 21 5 0
2017 15.3 15.3 26 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

491110 · TX · Fort Worth

13,818 Mail and Parcel Delivery employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 1,346 employers in Fort Worth, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 240055-BOS-CHELSEA CARRIER ANNEX 11.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR 056692-SAC-LAND PARK STA 11.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR CAGUAS_1356582 11.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR 245168-ABINGTON PO 11.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Pleasanton 198 FTE
STATE-SIZE D.R. Horton, Inc. - Houston 198 FTE
STATE-SIZE WINCO MASONRY LP 198 FTE
STATE-SIZE Culberson Construction LLC 198 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lockheed Martin Corporation US TX Fort Worth Lockheed Blvd (1093) 16,547 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lockheed Martin Corporation Fort Worth Campus (1093) 13,805 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cook Children's Medical Center 4,998 FTE
CITY-NEAR TX- Fort Worth 4,667 FTE
NAT-TCR 056692-Sac-Land Park Sta 11.8 TCR
NAT-TCR 240055-Bos-Chelsea Carrier Annex 11.8 TCR
NAT-TCR 6400-SWY-0027-0027-00503 11.8 TCR
NAT-TCR 6400-SWY-0019-0019-02623 11.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE 416087-Nrs-Tri-County Branch 198 FTE
NAT-SIZE Environmental Servcies 198 FTE
NAT-SIZE 2253-H4801 198 FTE
NAT-SIZE 5472-NAI-0033-0033-02594 198 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.