Mail and Parcel Delivery · Texas

488317-Ft Worth Insp Svc Division

Fort Worth, TX · ~73 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
3.6
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

488317-Ft Worth Insp Svc Division runs at 80% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Mail and Parcel Delivery workplace, earning a grade B.

488317-Ft Worth Insp Svc Division: 3.6 TCR = 80% of Mail and Parcel Delivery BLS 4.5 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

488317-Ft Worth Insp Svc Division safety composite

488317-Ft Worth Insp Svc Division scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 93% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

79/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 3.58 per 100 workers

Safer than 85% of industry peers

DART rate
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 93% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.2

2017→2022

488317-Ft Worth Insp Svc Division injury rate improved

488317-Ft Worth Insp Svc Division's TCR fell 5.2 from 7.3 in 2017 to 2.1 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2017 at 7.3 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=7.3 · 2018=1.5 · 2019=2.9 · 2020=4.1 · 2022=2.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 491110 · Fort Worth, TX AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 3.6 · 80% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #187/959
  • PHOTO FIESTA ANNEX_1451047
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~73 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: FIESTA ANNEX_1451047 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

488317-Ft Worth Insp Svc Division in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows 488317-Ft Worth Insp Svc Division averages 3.6 TCR (80% of the Mail and Parcel Delivery BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

488317-Ft Worth Insp Svc Division TCR series: 2017=7.3 · 2018=1.5 · 2019=2.9 · 2020=4.1 · 2022=2.1 · BLS 4.5

Where 488317-Ft Worth Insp Svc Division falls in its industry

13,818 Mail and Parcel Delivery establishments

Safer than 85% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #187 safest of 959 Mail and Parcel Delivery employers in Texas.

488317-Ft Worth Insp Svc Division (73 employees, TCR 3.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 51 employees and a TCR of 6.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate 488317-Ft Worth Insp Svc Division
488317-Ft Worth Insp Svc Division (73 employees, TCR 3.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 51 employees and a TCR of 6.8

488317-Ft Worth Insp Svc Division has more employees than the Mail and Parcel Delivery median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 2.1 0.0 1 0 0
2020 4.1 4.1 3 0 0
2019 2.9 2.9 2 0 0
2018 1.5 1.5 1 0 0
2017 7.3 7.3 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

491110 · TX · Fort Worth

13,818 Mail and Parcel Delivery employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 1,346 employers in Fort Worth, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR FIESTA ANNEX_1451047 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR HINESVILLE_1367082 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR ORANGE PARK_1376219 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR HIBISCUS CARRIER ANNEX_1438804 3.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Eden Green Technology 73 FTE
STATE-SIZE Treesap Farms LLC - Mill Creek 73 FTE
STATE-SIZE T-Rey Properties Inc. 73 FTE
STATE-SIZE CenterPoint Energy - South District Houston 73 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lockheed Martin Corporation US TX Fort Worth Lockheed Blvd (1093) 16,547 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lockheed Martin Corporation Fort Worth Campus (1093) 13,805 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cook Children's Medical Center 4,998 FTE
CITY-NEAR TX- Fort Worth 4,667 FTE
NAT-TCR 276812-Ridgeland Po 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 121606-Chatsworth Po 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 115 Family Fare Metro Health Pk Mi Ff, LLC 38-2750461 Was1593 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 096050-Seaford Po 3.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE 047011-Pine Bluff Po 73 FTE
NAT-SIZE 216580-Nor-Uptown Sta 73 FTE
NAT-SIZE 155325-Lewiston Po 73 FTE
NAT-SIZE 031481-Cha-Andersen Springs Sta 73 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.