Groceries, general-line, merchant wholesalers · California

502 California Systems

Sacramento, CA · ~109 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
20.1
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

502 California Systems runs at 916% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Groceries, general-line, merchant wholesalers workplace, earning a grade F.

502 California Systems: 20.1 TCR = 916% of Groceries, general-line, merchant wholesalers BLS 2.2 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

502 California Systems safety composite

502 California Systems scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

14/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 20.15 per 100 workers

Safer than 1% of industry peers

DART rate
F 19.49 per 100 workers

Safer than 1% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

502 California Systems: 16.6 → 20.2 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 35.5 TCR · DART/TCR 0.97× in 2024

502 California Systems's TCR rose 3.6 from 16.6 in 2020 to 20.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 35.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.97× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 424410 · Sacramento, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 20.1 · 916% of ind

  • DART 19.5 DART
  • RANK #136/140
  • PHOTO Restaurant Depot 530
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 132 inj
  • SIZE ~109 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Restaurant Depot 530 (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

502 California Systems in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows 502 California Systems averages 20.1 TCR (916% of the Groceries, general-line, merchant wholesalers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

502 California Systems TCR series: 2020=16.6 · 2021=35.5 · 2022=20 · 2023=8.5 · 2024=20.2 · BLS 2.2

Where 502 California Systems falls in its industry

1,651 Groceries, general-line, merch establishments

Safer than 1% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #136 safest of 140 Groceries, general-line, merch employers in California.

502 California Systems (109 employees, TCR 20.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 172 employees and a TCR of 6.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate 502 California Systems
502 California Systems (109 employees, TCR 20.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 172 employees and a TCR of 6.1

502 California Systems has fewer employees than the Groceries, general-line, merchant wholes median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 20.2 19.5 27 0 0
2023 8.5 7.0 11 0 0
2022 20.0 16.4 28 0 0
2021 35.5 31.6 46 0 0
2020 16.6 15.8 20 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

424410 · CA · Sacramento

1,651 Groceries, general-line, merchant wholesalers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 1,348 employers in Sacramento, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Restaurant Depot 530 20.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Jacobstein Foodservice LLC 20.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Restaurant Depot 650 20.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sysco Pittsburgh 20.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE BRAVANTE FARM MANAGEMENT 109 FTE
STATE-SIZE John Kautz Farms - Lodi, CA 109 FTE
STATE-SIZE G4 Farm Labor, Inc. 109 FTE
STATE-SIZE Elvira Sandoval 109 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC Davis Health 10,481 FTE
CITY-NEAR Employment Development Department 8,494 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 451 5,500 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 485 5,500 FTE
NAT-TCR Trader Joe's 0706 Chicago 20.1 TCR
NAT-TCR 017 Hatillo II 20.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Building Products Company LLC 20.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Good Samaritan Society 20.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Knoxville Beverage Company 109 FTE
NAT-SIZE 610 - Boise 109 FTE
NAT-SIZE 790 - Queens 109 FTE
NAT-SIZE 060a - Dallas Ar Call Center Fas 109 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.