Private warehousing and storage, general merchandise · Florida

5166 Fresenius Medical Care

Orlando, FL · ~64 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
2.3
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

5166 Fresenius Medical Care runs at 39% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Private warehousing and storage, general merchandise workplace, earning a grade A.

5166 Fresenius Medical Care: 2.3 TCR = 39% of Private warehousing and storage, general merchandise BLS 5.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

5166 Fresenius Medical Care safety composite

5166 Fresenius Medical Care scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 67% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

59/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.28 per 100 workers

Safer than 67% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.63 per 100 workers

Safer than 57% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

5166 Fresenius Medical Care: 0.0 → 1.6 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 5.6 TCR · DART/TCR 0.71× in 2024

5166 Fresenius Medical Care's TCR rose 1.6 from 0.0 in 2016 to 1.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 5.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.71× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493110 · Orlando, FL AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 2.3 · 39% of ind

  • DART 1.6 DART
  • RANK #108/412
  • PHOTO Arvin - 5337 South W…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 14 inj
  • SIZE ~64 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Arvin - 5337 South Wheeler Ridge Road (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

5166 Fresenius Medical Care in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows 5166 Fresenius Medical Care averages 2.3 TCR (39% of the Private warehousing and storage, general merchandise BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

5166 Fresenius Medical Care TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=1.3 · 2018=4.4 · 2019=5.6 · 2020=2.7 · 2021=1.4 · 2022=1.5 · 2023=1.9 · 2024=1.6 · BLS 5.8

Where 5166 Fresenius Medical Care falls in its industry

9,477 Private warehousing and storag establishments

Safer than 67% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #108 safest of 412 Private warehousing and storag employers in Florida.

5166 Fresenius Medical Care (64 employees, TCR 2.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate 5166 Fresenius Medical Care
5166 Fresenius Medical Care (64 employees, TCR 2.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5

5166 Fresenius Medical Care has fewer employees than the Private warehousing and storage, general median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.6 1.6 1 0 0
2023 1.9 1.9 1 0 0
2022 1.5 1.5 1 0 0
2021 1.4 1.4 1 0 0
2020 2.7 2.7 2 0 0
2019 5.6 4.2 4 0 0
2018 4.4 4.4 3 0 0
2017 1.3 1.3 1 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493110 · FL · Orlando

9,477 Private warehousing and storage, general merchandise employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 1,997 employers in Orlando, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Arvin - 5337 South Wheeler Ridge Road 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR 1100 Kennedy Rd Windsor CT 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Becton Dickinson 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR 30433 - CAPSTONE MCLANE SOUTHEAST ATHENS GA 2.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE AIREKO ENERGY SOLUTIONS US LLC 64 FTE
STATE-SIZE Golden Gate Service Center 64 FTE
STATE-SIZE Florida Division - Orlando 64 FTE
STATE-SIZE The Hill Group 64 FTE
CITY-NEAR Universal Orlando Resort 20,343 FTE
CITY-NEAR Universal Parks and Resorts : UO 13,442 FTE
CITY-NEAR ADVENTHEALTH ORLANDO 11,412 FTE
CITY-NEAR Florida Hospital Orlando 10,318 FTE
NAT-TCR Giant Eagle #0081 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR VuCon, LLC 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Zalkin Americas 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Primient Loudon Plant 2.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Drug Plastics and Glass Co., Inc. - Elysburg, PA 64 FTE
NAT-SIZE Utliities - Water Distribution 64 FTE
NAT-SIZE Aspro, Inc. 64 FTE
NAT-SIZE Field Services 64 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.