General warehousing and storage · North Carolina

5224 Bonded Logistics

Charlotte, NC · ~92 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
2.0
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

5224 Bonded Logistics runs at 34% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical General warehousing and storage workplace, earning a grade A.

5224 Bonded Logistics: 2.0 TCR = 34% of General warehousing and storage BLS 5.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

5224 Bonded Logistics safety composite

5224 Bonded Logistics scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 86% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

71/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.99 per 100 workers

Safer than 72% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

5224 Bonded Logistics held a steady TCR band

5224 Bonded Logistics's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 4.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=0.0 · 2018=3.3 · 2019=2.6 · 2020=1.9 · 2021=4.1 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493110 · Charlotte, NC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 2.0 · 34% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #102/330
  • PHOTO Suncast Corporation …
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 13 inj
  • SIZE ~92 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Suncast Corporation Batavia Distribution Center (BDC) (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

5224 Bonded Logistics in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows 5224 Bonded Logistics averages 2.0 TCR (34% of the General warehousing and storage BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

5224 Bonded Logistics TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=3.3 · 2019=2.6 · 2020=1.9 · 2021=4.1 · 2024=0 · BLS 5.8

Where 5224 Bonded Logistics falls in its industry

9,477 General warehousing and storag establishments

Safer than 72% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #102 safest of 330 General warehousing and storag employers in North Carolina.

5224 Bonded Logistics (92 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate 5224 Bonded Logistics
5224 Bonded Logistics (92 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5

5224 Bonded Logistics has more employees than the General warehousing and storage median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 4.1 4.1 4 0 0
2020 1.9 1.9 2 0 0
2019 2.6 0.9 3 0 0
2018 3.3 2.4 4 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493110 · NC · Charlotte

9,477 General warehousing and storage employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 2,058 employers in Charlotte, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Suncast Corporation Batavia Distribution Center (BDC) 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR ICW 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR 60511 - CAPSTONE HARDINS SYSCO MEMPHIS 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sandvik, Inc. Romeoville 2.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Aqua North Carolina, Inc. - Cary 92 FTE
STATE-SIZE Balfour Beatty - Havelock Bypass 92 FTE
STATE-SIZE Conover 92 FTE
STATE-SIZE Eldeco Inc Charlotte 92 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1101-Carolinas Medical Center (1101) 8,444 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0001-Carolinas Medical Center 8,032 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4795-AA-CLT-CHARLOTTE-CLT-TRML 7,295 FTE
CITY-NEAR Novant Health Presbyterian Medical Center 4,973 FTE
NAT-TCR IP Casino Resort Spa 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Hatteras Press Inc. 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Fieldale Farms - Feed Mill #2 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR ABC Construction Company Inc. 2.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE 110 Orlando 92 FTE
NAT-SIZE Xymox Technologies Inc. 92 FTE
NAT-SIZE Brush Masters Inc 92 FTE
NAT-SIZE RSA Engineered Products 92 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.