Local transit systems, mixed mode (e.g., bus, commuter rail, subway combinations) · Texas

55431 Fort Bend County

Rosenberg, TX · ~61 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.7
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

55431 Fort Bend County runs at 61% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Local transit systems, mixed mode (e.g., bus, commuter rail, subway combinations) workplace, earning a grade B.

55431 Fort Bend County: 2.7 TCR = 61% of Local transit systems, mixed mode (e.g., bus, commuter rail, subway combinations) BLS 4.5 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

55431 Fort Bend County safety composite

55431 Fort Bend County scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 81% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

72/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 2.74 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

DART rate
B 1.28 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.7

2019→2023

55431 Fort Bend County injury rate improved

55431 Fort Bend County's TCR fell 4.7 from 6.0 in 2019 to 1.3 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2019 at 6.0 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.47× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=6.0 · 2020=3.8 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=2.7 · 2023=1.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 485111 · Rosenberg, TX AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.7 · 61% of ind

  • DART 1.3 DART
  • RANK #7/16
  • PHOTO 2168 RCA MIDWAY ORAN…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~61 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 2168 RCA MIDWAY ORANGE LINE (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

55431 Fort Bend County in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows 55431 Fort Bend County averages 2.7 TCR (61% of the Local transit systems, mixed mode (e.g., bus, commuter rail, subway combinations) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

55431 Fort Bend County TCR series: 2019=6 · 2020=3.8 · 2021=0 · 2022=2.7 · 2023=1.3 · BLS 4.5

Where 55431 Fort Bend County falls in its industry

421 Local transit systems, mixed m establishments

Safer than 81% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 16 Local transit systems, mixed m employers in Texas.

55431 Fort Bend County (61 employees, TCR 2.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 217 employees and a TCR of 5.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate 55431 Fort Bend County
55431 Fort Bend County (61 employees, TCR 2.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 217 employees and a TCR of 5.8

55431 Fort Bend County has fewer employees than the Local transit systems, mixed mode (e.g., median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 1.3 1.3 1 0 0
2022 2.7 2.7 2 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 3.8 1.9 1 1 0
2019 6.0 3.6 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

485111 · TX · Rosenberg

421 Local transit systems, mixed mode (e.g., bus, commuter rail, subway combinations) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 68 employers in Rosenberg, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 2168 RCA MIDWAY ORANGE LINE 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR 55350 Colgate University 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR 3156 BUS MAINTENANCE TRAINING 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR San Bernardino, CA - Santa Fe Way 2.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE North Muleshoe Dairy LLC 61 FTE
STATE-SIZE Patriot Drilling LLC 61 FTE
STATE-SIZE TEXOMA SVC CTR 61 FTE
STATE-SIZE PEC-Cedar Park 61 FTE
CITY-NEAR ROSENBERG PLANT 1,146 FTE
CITY-NEAR DC16 DC16 ROSENBERG TX 796 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4186-DC16 474 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rosenberg 345 FTE
NAT-TCR Plasser American 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR 01-01-02/01-05-02 West Div - Golden Gate Region 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Adrian Jules Ltd 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Oklahoma City OK Yard (North) 2.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Dubuque Specialty Care 61 FTE
NAT-SIZE Machado Construction 61 FTE
NAT-SIZE Times Supermarket McCully 61 FTE
NAT-SIZE Jordy Construction 61 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.