Mixed mode transit systems (e.g., bus, commuter rail, subway combinations) · New York

57222 Allegany County Transit

Cuba, NY · ~48 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.8
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

57222 Allegany County Transit runs at 41% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Mixed mode transit systems (e.g., bus, commuter rail, subway combinations) workplace, earning a grade A.

57222 Allegany County Transit: 1.8 TCR = 41% of Mixed mode transit systems (e.g., bus, commuter rail, subway combinations) BLS 4.5 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

57222 Allegany County Transit safety composite

57222 Allegany County Transit scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 93% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

81/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.83 per 100 workers

Safer than 89% of industry peers

DART rate
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 93% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

57222 Allegany County Transit: 1.9 → 2.5 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 2.5 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2023

57222 Allegany County Transit's TCR rose 0.6 from 1.9 in 2019 to 2.5 in 2023. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 485111 · Cuba, NY AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.8 · 41% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1/11
  • PHOTO 2240 BLUE LINE SUPPORT
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~48 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 2240 BLUE LINE SUPPORT (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

57222 Allegany County Transit in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows 57222 Allegany County Transit averages 1.8 TCR (41% of the Mixed mode transit systems (e.g., bus, commuter rail, subway combinations) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

57222 Allegany County Transit TCR series: 2019=1.9 · 2020=2.4 · 2021=0 · 2022=2.4 · 2023=2.5 · BLS 4.5

Where 57222 Allegany County Transit falls in its industry

421 Mixed mode transit systems (e. establishments

Safer than 89% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 11 Mixed mode transit systems (e. employers in New York.

57222 Allegany County Transit (48 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 217 employees and a TCR of 5.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate 57222 Allegany County Transit
57222 Allegany County Transit (48 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 217 employees and a TCR of 5.8

57222 Allegany County Transit has fewer employees than the Mixed mode transit systems (e.g., bus, c median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 2.5 0.0 1 0 0
2022 2.4 0.0 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 2.4 0.0 1 0 0
2019 1.9 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

485111 · NY · Cuba

421 Mixed mode transit systems (e.g., bus, commuter rail, subway combinations) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 9 employers in Cuba, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 2240 BLUE LINE SUPPORT 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR 4254 RAIL STATION MGT SUPPORT B P 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR 4074 ELECTRICIANS 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Streetsboro, OH - Philipp Pkwy 1.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Kreher Enterprises LLC 48 FTE
STATE-SIZE SENECA STREET CREW LOCATION-NY04 48 FTE
STATE-SIZE NIAGARA FALLS SERVICE CENTER-NY37 48 FTE
STATE-SIZE Enbridge St. Lawrence Gas - Massena 48 FTE
CITY-NEAR Empire Cheese Inc. 234 FTE
CITY-NEAR Great Lakes Cheese 233 FTE
CITY-NEAR Allegany County Transit 58 FTE
CITY-NEAR Crosstex - Cuba, NY 40 FTE
NAT-TCR George Schild Inc 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Oak Hills Carton Co. 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Gean Farm Inc 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR McAlester Operations 1.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE North Georgia Distributing Co 48 FTE
NAT-SIZE NFI Interactive Logistics LLC-582 WILLIAMETTE RD 48 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ohio Valley District 48 FTE
NAT-SIZE Alberdingk Boley, Inc 48 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.