Commercial building construction general contractors · Arizona

5915090 MSO Intake and Transfer Facility

Phoenix, AZ · ~44 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.0
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

5915090 MSO Intake and Transfer Facility runs at 105% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Commercial building construction general contractors workplace, earning a grade C.

5915090 MSO Intake and Transfer Facility: 3.0 TCR = 105% of Commercial building construction general contractors BLS 2.9 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

5915090 MSO Intake and Transfer Facility safety composite

5915090 MSO Intake and Transfer Facility scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 7%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

31/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.04 per 100 workers

Safer than 40% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.09 per 100 workers

Safer than 7% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

5915090 MSO Intake and Transfer Facility: 0.0 → 6.1 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 6.1 TCR · DART/TCR 2× in 2018

5915090 MSO Intake and Transfer Facility's TCR rose 6.1 from 0.0 in 2017 to 6.1 in 2018. In 2018, DART was 2× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236220 · Phoenix, AZ ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.0 · 105% of ind

  • DART 6.1 DART
  • RANK #70/106
  • PHOTO Kenworth Chillicothe
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~44 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Kenworth Chillicothe (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

5915090 MSO Intake and Transfer Facility in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows 5915090 MSO Intake and Transfer Facility averages 3.0 TCR (105% of the Commercial building construction general contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

5915090 MSO Intake and Transfer Facility TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=6.1 · BLS 2.9

Where 5915090 MSO Intake and Transfer Facility falls in its industry

4,692 Commercial building constructi establishments

Safer than 40% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #70 safest of 106 Commercial building constructi employers in Arizona.

5915090 MSO Intake and Transfer Facility (44 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate 5915090 MSO Intake and Transfer Facility
5915090 MSO Intake and Transfer Facility (44 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3

5915090 MSO Intake and Transfer Facility has fewer employees than the Commercial building construction general median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 6.1 6.1 4 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236220 · AZ · Phoenix

4,692 Commercial building construction general contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 2,630 employers in Phoenix, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Kenworth Chillicothe 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Standback GC 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Custom Agri Systems - Upper Sandusky 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hall Arts Residences & Hotels #1714 3.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Coronation Peak Ranches, Inc. 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE AZ Alamo Ag Solutions, LLC 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sierra Vista Construction Office 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE Willcox Main Office 44 FTE
CITY-NEAR Maricopa County 15,504 FTE
CITY-NEAR Phoenix Children's Hospital 7,575 FTE
CITY-NEAR All Company 6,261 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6403-64030500 6,153 FTE
NAT-TCR Des Moines Two Rivers Electric 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Bemis North America - Lebanon 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Wally Cash Trucking Inc 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Layton Blvd. 3.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Ricky's 72nd Street 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE Building 1 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE Partsmaster - Northgate 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE KCP&L - Warrensburg Service Center 44 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.