Fitness centers · California

6 Hanford

Hanford, CA · ~50 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.9
Avg TCR
3.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

6 Hanford runs at 256% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Fitness centers workplace, earning a grade F.

6 Hanford: 7.9 TCR = 256% of Fitness centers BLS 3.1 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

6 Hanford safety composite

6 Hanford scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 19%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

27/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.94 per 100 workers

Safer than 19% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.61 per 100 workers

Safer than 19% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−6.7

2018→2019

6 Hanford injury rate improved

6 Hanford's TCR fell 6.7 from 11.3 in 2018 to 4.6 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2018 at 11.3 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0.58× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=11.3 · 2019=4.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 713940 · Hanford, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 7.9 · 256% of ind

  • DART 4.6 DART
  • RANK #132/190
  • PHOTO Glassell Pool
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~50 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Glassell Pool (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

6 Hanford in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows 6 Hanford averages 7.9 TCR (256% of the Fitness centers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

6 Hanford TCR series: 2018=11.3 · 2019=4.6 · BLS 3.1

Where 6 Hanford falls in its industry

629 Fitness centers establishments

Safer than 19% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #132 safest of 190 Fitness centers employers in California.

6 Hanford (50 employees, TCR 7.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 62 employees and a TCR of 4.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate 6 Hanford
6 Hanford (50 employees, TCR 7.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 62 employees and a TCR of 4.2

6 Hanford has fewer employees than the Fitness centers median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 4.6 4.6 1 0 0
2018 11.3 11.3 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

713940 · CA · Hanford

629 Fitness centers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 118 employers in Hanford, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Glassell Pool 8.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mid Ice, LLC 8.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Franciscan Health Fitness Center 8.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR 22 Mooney North 8.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Jack Bros., Inc. 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE M Three Ranches, LLC 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE Penterman Farming Company 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE Trefethen Farming, LLC 50 FTE
CITY-NEAR Daniel C. Salas Harvesting Inc. 2,932 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hanford Community Hospital 1,849 FTE
CITY-NEAR 9292-AHHF001 - HOSPITAL 1,153 FTE
CITY-NEAR A.M. AG ENTERPRISE, INC. 976 FTE
NAT-TCR Teasdale Latin Foods (Hoopeston, IL) 7.9 TCR
NAT-TCR 8912 Las Vegas Framing 7.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Park Distrit of Highland Park 636 7.9 TCR
NAT-TCR The Breckinridge 7.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE RESA Power - Cicero 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE RPM Diesel Engine Co 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE Brm Wgs 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE Toshiba America Business Solutions - Memphis 50 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.