Nursing and Residential Care · Maryland

6103

Timonium, MD · ~163 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
14.1
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities

The verdict

6103 runs at 370% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Nursing and Residential Care workplace, earning a grade F.

F
Failing Safety Record
14.1
avg TCR · per 100 workers
3.8
industry benchmark (BLS)
2
recordable injuries tracked

Grade compares 6103's OSHA Total Case Rate of 14.1 to the Nursing and Residential Care BLS benchmark of 3.8 (370% of benchmark) across 2 years of Form 300A filings (2016–2024). <a href="/methodology">See methodology</a> for reporting-limitation caveats.

Injury rate over time

6103's yearly Total Case Rate, against the 3.8 industry benchmark.

05101520 20202021 15.33.8 Industry benchmark6103 TCR
Total Case Rate (recordable injuries per 100 full-time workers), OSHA ITA Form 300A. Industry benchmark: BLS IIF, NAICS 623311.

Where 6103 falls in its industry

4,333 Nursing and Residential Care establishments

Safer than 14% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Maryland alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #87 safest of 95 Nursing and Residential Care employers in Maryland.

Trend analysis for 6103

Between 2020 and 2021, 6103's Total Case Rate worsened from 12.8 to 15.3 recordable injuries per 100 full-time workers, a 20% increase across 1 year of OSHA reporting.

The safest year on record was 2020, at a TCR of 12.8, while 2021 saw the highest rate, at 15.3, a spread of 2.6 points between the best and worst reporting years. That's a comparatively narrow spread, suggesting a fairly consistent safety record across the 2 years with a usable rate on file, rather than one outlier year skewing the multi-year average.

Summed across those 2 reporting years, 6103 recorded 2 total injuries and illnesses, with no fatalities reported in any of those years. Readers comparing establishments should weigh the 2-year trend above alongside establishment size, since a larger workforce naturally accumulates more raw incidents even at a lower per-100-worker rate.

Verify This Employer with OSHA

The 2 injuries, 20 illnesses shown on this page for 6103 are sourced from its own 2 years of mandatory OSHA Form 300A summaries. Cross-check the underlying establishment record directly against the federal source, name, NAICS classification, recordable case totals, and inspection history are all searchable on OSHA's Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data system.

Verify on OSHA Establishment Search

Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data. NAICS 623311 - Nursing and Residential Care.

DART Rate, Transparent Calculation (2021)

What is the DART rate formula?

DART (Days Away, Restricted, or Transferred) is computed by OSHA as incidents × 200,000 ÷ hours worked. The 200,000-hour denominator equals roughly 100 full-time workers, which lets establishments of very different sizes be compared directly.

11 DART incidents × 200,000 ÷ 156,513 hours worked = 14.06 DART

Methodology: 29 CFR 1904, OSHA Form 300A recordkeeping

Cross-Validating Context, Establishment vs Industry vs State

Benchmark TCR Source
6103 (this establishment) 14.05 OSHA ITA Form 300A, 2-year avg
Continuing care retirement communities industry avg 3.80 BLS IIF, NAICS 623311
Maryland state avg (all industries) 4.70 OSHA ITA, state-level rollup

Industry benchmarks: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Injuries, Illnesses, and Fatalities (IIF) program

Reportable Incident Timeline

Year-by-year reportable incidents (recordable injuries + illnesses + fatalities) submitted by 6103 to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Each row anchors to OSHA's inspection records search where you can pull the underlying inspection case numbers and citations for that establishment-year.

Source: OSHA Inspection Information System (IMIS) - inspection case-number records

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 15.3 14.1 1 11 0
2020 12.8 10.2 1 9 0

What this grade means for you

Use this grade as a relative read on 6103's reported OSHA injury record versus its Nursing and Residential Care peers, not a verdict on whether any single site is safe today.

  • At 370% of the Nursing and Residential Care benchmark, 6103 reports more injuries than typical peers, ask specifically how the employer is reducing them. Know your rights
  • Judge this record against the wider Nursing and Residential Care sector, where injury rates vary widely, before comparing it in isolation. See the industry
  • Grades reflect 2016–2024 filings; check the latest establishment record straight from OSHA, or look up a different employer. Look up another

Safety grades reflect employers' self-reported OSHA Form 300A filings from 2016 to 2024 and can lag current conditions. A grade is not a guarantee that any specific workplace is safe or unsafe today. See our methodology and disclaimer.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is 6103's safety grade?
6103 has a safety grade of F (Failing Safety Record). This grade is based on their average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 14.1 compared to the BLS industry benchmark of 3.8 for Nursing and Residential Care.
How many injuries has 6103 reported?
6103 has reported 2 total injuries and 0 fatalities across 2 years of OSHA data (2021, 2020). This data comes from mandatory OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA) reports.

Similar Employers

Matched by safety record across the industry, by workforce size within Maryland, and by nearby establishments in Timonium - a different peer set than the category browse links below.

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial

Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.