General warehousing and storage · South Carolina

62042 - Capstone Us Foods Fort Mill Sc

Fort Mill, SC · ~48 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
8.0
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

62042 - Capstone Us Foods Fort Mill Sc runs at 138% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical General warehousing and storage workplace, earning a grade D.

62042 - Capstone Us Foods Fort Mill Sc: 8.0 TCR = 138% of General warehousing and storage BLS 5.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

62042 - Capstone Us Foods Fort Mill Sc safety composite

62042 - Capstone Us Foods Fort Mill Sc scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 12%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

23/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 8.02 per 100 workers

Safer than 15% of industry peers

DART rate
F 7.58 per 100 workers

Safer than 12% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

62042 - Capstone Us Foods Fort Mill Sc: 2.5 → 9.5 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 16.3 TCR · DART/TCR 0.95× in 2024

62042 - Capstone Us Foods Fort Mill Sc's TCR rose 7.0 from 2.5 in 2019 to 9.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 16.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.95× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493110 · Fort Mill, SC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 8.0 · 138% of ind

  • DART 7.6 DART
  • RANK #141/160
  • PHOTO ECDC BLDG 23 - 3039
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 17 inj
  • SIZE ~48 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: ECDC BLDG 23 - 3039 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

62042 - Capstone Us Foods Fort Mill Sc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows 62042 - Capstone Us Foods Fort Mill Sc averages 8.0 TCR (138% of the General warehousing and storage BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

62042 - Capstone Us Foods Fort Mill Sc TCR series: 2019=2.5 · 2021=5.9 · 2022=5.9 · 2023=16.3 · 2024=9.5 · BLS 5.8

Where 62042 - Capstone Us Foods Fort Mill Sc falls in its industry

9,477 General warehousing and storag establishments

Safer than 15% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #141 safest of 160 General warehousing and storag employers in South Carolina.

62042 - Capstone Us Foods Fort Mill Sc (48 employees, TCR 8.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate 62042 - Capstone Us Foods Fort Mill Sc
62042 - Capstone Us Foods Fort Mill Sc (48 employees, TCR 8.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5

62042 - Capstone Us Foods Fort Mill Sc has fewer employees than the General warehousing and storage median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 9.5 7.6 5 0 0
2023 16.3 14.0 7 0 0
2022 5.9 5.9 2 0 0
2021 5.9 5.9 2 0 0
2019 2.5 2.5 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493110 · SC · Fort Mill

9,477 General warehousing and storage employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 121 employers in Fort Mill, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR ECDC BLDG 23 - 3039 8.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR 6795-86300B0199 8.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR FDC Graphic Films, Inc. 8.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Amazon.com Services LLC - GSP1 8.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE BEAUFORT DISTRICT OFFICE 48 FTE
STATE-SIZE Palmetto Sitework Services, LLC 48 FTE
STATE-SIZE HUNTER SPECIALTIES, INC. 48 FTE
STATE-SIZE Carolina Pole, Inc. 48 FTE
CITY-NEAR South East Distribution Center SEDC 1,467 FTE
CITY-NEAR South East Distribution Center - SEDC 1,078 FTE
CITY-NEAR Shutterfly Fort Mill 841 FTE
CITY-NEAR US FOODS FORT MILL 719 FTE
NAT-TCR Jacketta Sweeping Service 8.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Maplewood of Sauk Prairie 8.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Mumm Napa Estate 8.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Reading, Pennsylvania 8.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Curry Chevrolet 48 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ardu Recovery Center 48 FTE
NAT-SIZE Action Fabricating, Inc. 48 FTE
NAT-SIZE Eastham Forge Inc 48 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.