medicinal and botanical manufacturing · New York

6319-020061

Ronkonkoma, NY · ~329 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities

The verdict

6319-020061 runs at 5% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical medicinal and botanical manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.1
avg TCR · per 100 workers
3.3
industry benchmark (BLS)
3
recordable injuries tracked

Grade compares 6319-020061's OSHA Total Case Rate to the BLS industry benchmark across 6 years of Form 300A filings (2016–2024). This reflects reported recordable injuries, not an independent safety inspection -- underreporting is a known limitation of employer self-recordkeeping.

Injury rate over time

6319-020061's yearly Total Case Rate, against the 3.3 industry benchmark.

-101234 201620172018201920202021 03.3 Industry benchmark6319-020061 TCR
Total Case Rate (recordable injuries per 100 full-time workers), OSHA ITA Form 300A. Industry benchmark: BLS IIF, NAICS 325411.

Where 6319-020061 falls in its industry

301 medicinal and botanical manufa establishments

Safer than 86% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 15 medicinal and botanical manufa employers in New York.

6319-020061 has an average TCR of 0.1, which is 5% of the industry average (3.3) for medicinal and botanical manufacturing. This is significantly better than average.

The letter grade is a transparent derived index PlainSafetyScore computes from public OSHA ITA and BLS benchmark data, not an official OSHA rating or safety certification. Full formula and thresholds: Methodology.

Trend analysis for 6319-020061

Between 2016 and 2021, 6319-020061's Total Case Rate improved from 0.3 to 0.0 recordable injuries per 100 full-time workers, a 100% decrease across 5 years of OSHA reporting.

The safest year on record was 2018, at a TCR of 0.0, while 2020 saw the highest rate, at 0.4, a spread of 0.4 points between the best and worst reporting years. That's a wide swing relative to the establishment's overall rate, worth checking the year-by-year table below for whether a single severe year is driving the average, rather than a sustained trend.

Summed across those 6 reporting years, 6319-020061 recorded 3 total injuries and illnesses, with no fatalities reported in any of those years. Readers comparing establishments should weigh the 6-year trend above alongside establishment size, since a larger workforce naturally accumulates more raw incidents even at a lower per-100-worker rate.

Verify This Employer with OSHA

All injury, illness, and fatality figures on this page are sourced from 6319-020061's own mandatory OSHA Form 300A summaries. Cross-check the underlying establishment record directly against the federal source, name, NAICS classification, recordable case totals, and inspection history are all searchable on OSHA's Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data system.

Verify on OSHA Establishment Search

Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data. NAICS 325411 - medicinal and botanical manufacturing.

DART Rate, Transparent Calculation (2021)

DART (Days Away, Restricted, or Transferred) is computed by OSHA as incidents × 200,000 ÷ hours worked. The 200,000-hour denominator equals roughly 100 full-time workers, which lets establishments of very different sizes be compared directly.

0 DART incidents × 200,000 ÷ 475,478 hours worked = 0.00 DART

Methodology: 29 CFR 1904, OSHA Form 300A recordkeeping

Cross-Validating Context, Establishment vs Industry vs State

Benchmark TCR Source
6319-020061 (this establishment) 0.15 OSHA ITA Form 300A, 6-year avg
Vitamins, uncompounded, manufacturing industry avg 3.30 BLS IIF, NAICS 325411
New York state avg (all industries) 4.67 OSHA ITA, state-level rollup

Industry benchmarks: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Injuries, Illnesses, and Fatalities (IIF) program

Reportable Incident Timeline

Year-by-year reportable incidents (recordable injuries + illnesses + fatalities) submitted by 6319-020061 to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Each row anchors to OSHA's inspection records search where you can pull the underlying inspection case numbers and citations for that establishment-year.

Source: OSHA Inspection Information System (IMIS) - inspection case-number records

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.4 0.4 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.3 0.0 1 0 0
2016 0.3 0.3 1 0 0

What this grade means for you

Use this grade as a relative read on 6319-020061's reported OSHA injury record, strong versus its medicinal and botanical manufacturing peers, but not a guarantee about any single site today.

  • At 5% of the medicinal and botanical manufacturing benchmark, 6319-020061 reports fewer injuries than typical peers, still worth asking how safety is managed day to day. Know your rights
  • Judge this record against the wider medicinal and botanical manufacturing sector, where injury rates vary widely, before comparing it in isolation. See the industry
  • Grades reflect 2016–2024 filings; check the latest establishment record straight from OSHA, or look up a different employer. Look up another

Safety grades reflect employers' self-reported OSHA Form 300A filings from 2016 to 2024 and can lag current conditions. A grade is not a guarantee that any specific workplace is safe or unsafe today. See our methodology and disclaimer.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is 6319-020061's safety grade?
6319-020061 has a safety grade of A (Excellent Safety Record). This grade is based on their average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 0.1 compared to the BLS industry benchmark of 3.3 for medicinal and botanical manufacturing.
How many injuries has 6319-020061 reported?
6319-020061 has reported 3 total injuries and 0 fatalities across 6 years of OSHA data (2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016). This data comes from mandatory OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA) reports.

Similar Employers

Matched by safety record across the industry and by workforce size within New York - a different peer set than the category browse links below.

Similar TCR (~0.1)

Similar size (~329 workers)

Explore More Safety Data

→ More employers in New York → Industry: medicinal and botanical manufacturing → Safety grades explained → How to check employer safety → Understanding OSHA rates
Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Related

All employers → | Rankings →
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial

Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.