Roofing, Siding, and Insulation Material Merchant Wholesalers · Texas

632 - San Antonio Branch - Rsg

San Antonio, TX · ~32 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
5.9
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

632 - San Antonio Branch - Rsg runs at 270% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Roofing, Siding, and Insulation Material Merchant Wholesalers workplace, earning a grade F.

632 - San Antonio Branch - Rsg: 5.9 TCR = 270% of Roofing, Siding, and Insulation Material Merchant Wholesalers BLS 2.2 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

632 - San Antonio Branch - Rsg safety composite

632 - San Antonio Branch - Rsg scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 40%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

46/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 5.93 per 100 workers

Safer than 48% of industry peers

DART rate
D 6.19 per 100 workers

Safer than 40% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.0

2017→2020

632 - San Antonio Branch - Rsg injury rate improved

632 - San Antonio Branch - Rsg's TCR fell 2.0 from 8.2 in 2017 to 6.2 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2017 at 8.2 TCR. In 2020, DART was 1.04× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=8.2 · 2018=3.4 · 2020=6.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 423330 · San Antonio, TX ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 5.9 · 270% of ind

  • DART 6.2 DART
  • RANK #56/102
  • PHOTO PSC Industries - Col…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~32 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: PSC Industries - Columbia (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

632 - San Antonio Branch - Rsg in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows 632 - San Antonio Branch - Rsg averages 5.9 TCR (270% of the Roofing, Siding, and Insulation Material Merchant Wholesalers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

632 - San Antonio Branch - Rsg TCR series: 2017=8.2 · 2018=3.4 · 2020=6.2 · BLS 2.2

Where 632 - San Antonio Branch - Rsg falls in its industry

953 Roofing, Siding, and Insulatio establishments

Safer than 48% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #56 safest of 102 Roofing, Siding, and Insulatio employers in Texas.

632 - San Antonio Branch - Rsg (32 employees, TCR 5.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 31 employees and a TCR of 5.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate 632 - San Antonio Branch - Rsg
632 - San Antonio Branch - Rsg (32 employees, TCR 5.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 31 employees and a TCR of 5.7

632 - San Antonio Branch - Rsg has more employees than the Roofing, Siding, and Insulation Material median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 6.2 6.2 2 0 0
2018 3.4 3.4 1 0 0
2017 8.2 5.5 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

423330 · TX · San Antonio

953 Roofing, Siding, and Insulation Material Merchant Wholesalers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 2,207 employers in San Antonio, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR PSC Industries - Columbia 5.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR 510 - WHITE PLAINS BRANCH 6.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR ABC Supply Co Inc, 027 Norfolk, VA 6.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR 401 ABC Supply Co., inc 6.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Heifer Ranch at Arroyo Seco, LTD 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE El Coyote Ranch 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE Green Plains Cattle Company LLC- Tulia 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE Feather Crest Farm 32 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bexar County Hospital District 8,703 FTE
CITY-NEAR Legend Oaks Health & Rehabilitation West San Antonio 6,953 FTE
CITY-NEAR ISS Facility Services Inc. 6,177 FTE
CITY-NEAR Buena Vida of San Antonio 5,262 FTE
NAT-TCR Nobles Worldwide, Inc. 5.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Meijer 289 5.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Pensacola Moving & Storage 5.9 TCR
NAT-TCR syncreon-Temperance 5.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Casa Pools 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE NAMJet LLC 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Axcesor Inc. 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Virgina American Water - Alexandria District 32 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.