General Medical and Surgical Hospitals · California

64030151-151001 Mercy Medical Center Redding

Redding, CA · ~1,704 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
8.4
Avg TCR
7.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

64030151-151001 Mercy Medical Center Redding runs at 112% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical General Medical and Surgical Hospitals workplace, earning a grade C.

64030151-151001 Mercy Medical Center Redding: 8.4 TCR = 112% of General Medical and Surgical Hospitals BLS 7.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

64030151-151001 Mercy Medical Center Redding safety composite

64030151-151001 Mercy Medical Center Redding scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 14%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

24/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 8.37 per 100 workers

Safer than 14% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.15 per 100 workers

Safer than 15% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.2

2023→2024

64030151-151001 Mercy Medical Center Redding injury rate improved

64030151-151001 Mercy Medical Center Redding's TCR fell 2.2 from 9.4 in 2023 to 7.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 9.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.5× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2023=9.4 · 2024=7.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 622110 · Redding, CA ABOVE-IND · LARGE

Grade C · TCR 8.4 · 112% of ind

  • DART 4.2 DART
  • RANK #484/662
  • PHOTO St. Francis Eastside
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 201 inj
  • SIZE ~1,704 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: St. Francis Eastside (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

64030151-151001 Mercy Medical Center Redding in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows 64030151-151001 Mercy Medical Center Redding averages 8.4 TCR (112% of the General Medical and Surgical Hospitals BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

64030151-151001 Mercy Medical Center Redding TCR series: 2023=9.4 · 2024=7.3 · BLS 7.5

Where 64030151-151001 Mercy Medical Center Redding falls in its industry

6,862 General Medical and Surgical H establishments

Safer than 14% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #484 safest of 662 General Medical and Surgical H employers in California.

64030151-151001 Mercy Medical Center Redding (1,704 employees, TCR 8.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 492 employees and a TCR of 5.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate 64030151-151001 Mercy Medical Center Redding
64030151-151001 Mercy Medical Center Redding (1,704 employees, TCR 8.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 492 employees and a TCR of 5.2

64030151-151001 Mercy Medical Center Redding has more employees than the General Medical and Surgical Hospitals median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 7.3 4.2 95 12 0
2023 9.4 6.1 106 29 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

622110 · CA · Redding

6,862 General Medical and Surgical Hospitals employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 207 employers in Redding, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR St. Francis Eastside 8.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sparta 8.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bell Hospital 8.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Superior Campus 8.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE 2261-00000320 1,706 FTE
STATE-SIZE OUTSOURCE, LLC 1,701 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2643-64030306-306001 1,701 FTE
STATE-SIZE CABOWERS Campus 1,708 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6403-64030151 1,894 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mercy Medical Center Redding 1,789 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2643-64030151-151001 1,662 FTE
CITY-NEAR City of Redding 1,154 FTE
NAT-TCR Schoolyard Square 8.4 TCR
NAT-TCR The Homestead At Anoka 8.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Manufacturing Plant 8.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Arizona Shower Door of Colorado 8.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Jabil Corporate and Regional Managing Offices 1,704 FTE
NAT-SIZE Amzl : Dda2 1,704 FTE
NAT-SIZE Genesis Medical Center East Campus 1,704 FTE
NAT-SIZE Grand Isle Shipyard, LLC 1,703 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.