Supermarkets and Other Grocery Except Convenience Stores · Arizona

660-00017

Tucson, AZ · ~121 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.7
Avg TCR
3.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

660-00017 runs at 169% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Supermarkets and Other Grocery Except Convenience Stores workplace, earning a grade D.

660-00017: 5.7 TCR = 169% of Supermarkets and Other Grocery Except Convenience Stores BLS 3.4 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

660-00017 safety composite

660-00017 scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 53% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 37%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

46/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 5.73 per 100 workers

Safer than 37% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.35 per 100 workers

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.6

2016→2024

660-00017 injury rate improved

660-00017's TCR fell 2.6 from 6.1 in 2016 to 3.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 18.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.41× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=6.1 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=6.6 · 2019=4.0 · 2020=18.9 · 2021=4.2 · 2022=4.5 · 2023=3.7 · 2024=3.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 445110 · Tucson, AZ ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 5.7 · 169% of ind

  • DART 2.4 DART
  • RANK #512/822
  • PHOTO Big E's Supermarket
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 31 inj
  • SIZE ~121 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Big E's Supermarket (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

660-00017 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows 660-00017 averages 5.7 TCR (169% of the Supermarkets and Other Grocery Except Convenience Stores BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

660-00017 TCR series: 2016=6.1 · 2017=0 · 2018=6.6 · 2019=4 · 2020=18.9 · 2021=4.2 · 2022=4.5 · 2023=3.7 · 2024=3.5 · BLS 3.4

Where 660-00017 falls in its industry

30,654 Supermarkets and Other Grocery establishments

Safer than 37% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #512 safest of 822 Supermarkets and Other Grocery employers in Arizona.

660-00017 (121 employees, TCR 5.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 99 employees and a TCR of 4.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate 660-00017
660-00017 (121 employees, TCR 5.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 99 employees and a TCR of 4.7

660-00017 has more employees than the Supermarkets and Other Grocery Except Co median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.5 2.4 3 0 0
2023 3.7 2.5 2 1 0
2022 4.5 4.5 2 2 0
2021 4.2 4.2 4 0 0
2020 18.9 18.9 2 16 0
2019 4.0 3.0 4 0 0
2018 6.6 4.7 7 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 6.1 3.5 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

445110 · AZ · Tucson

30,654 Supermarkets and Other Grocery Except Convenience Stores employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 1,150 employers in Tucson, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Big E's Supermarket 5.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Gallagher of Port Jefferson 5.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR SUPERMERCADOS MORELOS - LA UNION 4 LLC 5.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR RPCS Inc. dba Price Cutter #74 5.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE 6340-IES-001027_US_S0459 121 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2807-1728 121 FTE
STATE-SIZE SWY-0017-0017-03322 FAC-03322-TUCSON-AZ 121 FTE
STATE-SIZE SWY-0017-0017-01491 FAC-01491-SCOTTSDALE-AZ 121 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Arizona 18,951 FTE
CITY-NEAR Raytheon_Tucson_AZ_Airport Site 9,878 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tucson Medical Center 4,407 FTE
CITY-NEAR U.S. Border Patrol Sector - Tucson 3,989 FTE
NAT-TCR Mission Point of Grandville 5.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Timberlane, Inc. 5.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Bulldog Movers Inc 5.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Giant Eagle #0012 5.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Behnke Enterprises, Inc. 121 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ampco Pumps Company 121 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tri Wall International Paper 121 FTE
NAT-SIZE Caviness Beef Ltd. 121 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.