General Warehousing and Storage · Indiana

6938 Mdv Bloomington Dc (in)

Bloomington, IN · ~90 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
16.9
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

6938 Mdv Bloomington Dc (in) runs at 292% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical General Warehousing and Storage workplace, earning a grade F.

6938 Mdv Bloomington Dc (in): 16.9 TCR = 292% of General Warehousing and Storage BLS 5.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

6938 Mdv Bloomington Dc (in) safety composite

6938 Mdv Bloomington Dc (in) scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 2%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

22/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 16.91 per 100 workers

Safer than 2% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.71 per 100 workers

Safer than 25% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−8.7

2016→2022

6938 Mdv Bloomington Dc (in) injury rate improved

6938 Mdv Bloomington Dc (in)'s TCR fell 8.7 from 15.7 in 2016 to 7.1 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2020 at 32.6 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.28× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=15.7 · 2017=6.7 · 2018=28.4 · 2019=17.8 · 2020=32.6 · 2021=10.1 · 2022=7.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493110 · Bloomington, IN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 16.9 · 292% of ind

  • DART 4.7 DART
  • RANK #359/366
  • PHOTO Continental Mills Tu…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 114 inj
  • SIZE ~90 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Continental Mills Tukwila (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

6938 Mdv Bloomington Dc (in) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows 6938 Mdv Bloomington Dc (in) averages 16.9 TCR (292% of the General Warehousing and Storage BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

6938 Mdv Bloomington Dc (in) TCR series: 2016=15.7 · 2017=6.7 · 2018=28.4 · 2019=17.8 · 2020=32.6 · 2021=10.1 · 2022=7.1 · BLS 5.8

Where 6938 Mdv Bloomington Dc (in) falls in its industry

9,477 General Warehousing and Storag establishments

Safer than 2% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #359 safest of 366 General Warehousing and Storag employers in Indiana.

6938 Mdv Bloomington Dc (in) (90 employees, TCR 16.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate 6938 Mdv Bloomington Dc (in)
6938 Mdv Bloomington Dc (in) (90 employees, TCR 16.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5

6938 Mdv Bloomington Dc (in) has fewer employees than the General Warehousing and Storage median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 7.1 4.7 6 0 0
2021 10.1 9.2 11 0 0
2020 32.6 30.5 31 0 0
2019 17.8 17.8 15 0 0
2018 28.4 28.4 23 0 0
2017 6.7 6.7 9 0 0
2016 15.7 15.7 19 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493110 · IN · Bloomington

9,477 General Warehousing and Storage employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 204 employers in Bloomington, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Continental Mills Tukwila 16.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : SJC7 16.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Oxnard 16.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Amazon.com Services LLC - HIL3 17.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE NineStar Connect-South Campus 90 FTE
STATE-SIZE The Skillman Corporation 90 FTE
STATE-SIZE E & B PAVING LLC - Kokomo 90 FTE
STATE-SIZE Peterman 90 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cook Incorporated Park 48 3,062 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cook Inc 2,976 FTE
CITY-NEAR CI-P48 2,567 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bloomington 2,251 FTE
NAT-TCR Goodwill Industries of Colorado - Iliff 16.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Ameritech Orlando, FL 104 16.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Manteca Drivers CBA-PR Only 16.9 TCR
NAT-TCR The Gates South Beach Hotel 16.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Buffalo Branch Office 90 FTE
NAT-SIZE 1573 D&W -Gr. Rapids, MI PREVO'S #38-3345860 90 FTE
NAT-SIZE 3361 Fresh City Market (Madison, Wi) 90 FTE
NAT-SIZE 3811 Family Fare (203rd St, Omaha, Ne) 90 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.