General warehousing and storage · Michigan

70394 Capstone - SP Spartan Nash Grand Rapids

Byron Center, MI · ~80 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.9
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

70394 Capstone - SP Spartan Nash Grand Rapids runs at 15% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical General warehousing and storage workplace, earning a grade A.

70394 Capstone - SP Spartan Nash Grand Rapids: 0.9 TCR = 15% of General warehousing and storage BLS 5.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

70394 Capstone - SP Spartan Nash Grand Rapids safety composite

70394 Capstone - SP Spartan Nash Grand Rapids scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 91% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

72/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.88 per 100 workers

Safer than 91% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.88 per 100 workers

Safer than 65% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

70394 Capstone - SP Spartan Nash Grand Rapids: 0.0 → 1.8 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 1.8 TCR · DART/TCR 1× in 2022

70394 Capstone - SP Spartan Nash Grand Rapids's TCR rose 1.8 from 0.0 in 2021 to 1.8 in 2022. In 2022, DART was 1× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493110 · Byron Center, MI AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.9 · 15% of ind

  • DART 0.9 DART
  • RANK #15/194
  • PHOTO Taylored Services LL…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~80 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Taylored Services LLC - Fontana (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

70394 Capstone - SP Spartan Nash Grand Rapids in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows 70394 Capstone - SP Spartan Nash Grand Rapids averages 0.9 TCR (15% of the General warehousing and storage BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-09-26

70394 Capstone - SP Spartan Nash Grand Rapids TCR series: 2021=0 · 2022=1.8 · BLS 5.8

Where 70394 Capstone - SP Spartan Nash Grand Rapids falls in its industry

9,477 General warehousing and storag establishments

Safer than 91% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #15 safest of 194 General warehousing and storag employers in Michigan.

70394 Capstone - SP Spartan Nash Grand Rapids (80 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate 70394 Capstone - SP Spartan Nash Grand Rapids
70394 Capstone - SP Spartan Nash Grand Rapids (80 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5

70394 Capstone - SP Spartan Nash Grand Rapids has fewer employees than the General warehousing and storage median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 1.8 0.9 2 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493110 · MI · Byron Center

9,477 General warehousing and storage employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 78 employers in Byron Center, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Taylored Services LLC - Fontana 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR MCO - TPA Main Facility 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cal Cartage Warehousing & Transloading LLC-Hwy 25 & 307 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Polaris Inc. Milford East 0.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE EHP - Eastern 80 FTE
STATE-SIZE Capital Sales Company 80 FTE
STATE-SIZE FedEx 4455 LINDEN CREEK PKWY 80 FTE
STATE-SIZE Faurecia FCM Taylor 80 FTE
CITY-NEAR Buist Electric 390 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lumbermen's Inc. Byron Center 344 FTE
CITY-NEAR Masterpiece Flower Company LLC 303 FTE
CITY-NEAR Van Eerden Trucking 254 FTE
NAT-TCR ASC - Seattle 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR GlobalFoundries TGCM 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Berridge - Corporate 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Headquarters 0.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Market Place #520 80 FTE
NAT-SIZE Manheim Harrisonburg 80 FTE
NAT-SIZE NA-US-NJ-Pine Brook-Chapin Road 80 FTE
NAT-SIZE 5472-NAI-0034-0034-00882 80 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.