Commercial and Industrial Machinery and Equipment (except Automotive and Electronic) Repair and Maintenance · Indiana

707 USG East Chicago, IN

East Chicago, IN · ~26 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.0
Avg TCR
2.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

707 USG East Chicago, IN runs at 0% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Commercial and Industrial Machinery and Equipment (except Automotive and Electronic) Repair and Maintenance workplace, earning a grade C.

707 USG East Chicago, IN: 0.0 TCR = 0% of Commercial and Industrial Machinery and Equipment (except Automotive and Electronic) Repair and Maintenance BLS 2.1 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

707 USG East Chicago, IN safety composite

707 USG East Chicago, IN scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

79/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 76% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

707 USG East Chicago, IN held a steady TCR band

707 USG East Chicago, IN's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2017 at 0.0 TCR.

2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 811310 · East Chicago, IN AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 0.0 · 0% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #0/90
  • PHOTO Beaumont Branch
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~26 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Beaumont Branch (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

707 USG East Chicago, IN in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows 707 USG East Chicago, IN averages 0.0 TCR (0% of the Commercial and Industrial Machinery and Equipment (except Automotive and Electronic) Repair and Maintenance BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-09-26

707 USG East Chicago, IN TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · BLS 2.1

Where 707 USG East Chicago, IN falls in its industry

2,560 Commercial and Industrial Mach establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #0 safest of 90 Commercial and Industrial Mach employers in Indiana.

707 USG East Chicago, IN (26 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate 707 USG East Chicago, IN
707 USG East Chicago, IN (26 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7

707 USG East Chicago, IN has fewer employees than the Commercial and Industrial Machinery and median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

811310 · IN · East Chicago

2,560 Commercial and Industrial Machinery and Equipment (except Automotive and Electronic) Repair and Maintenance employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 69 employers in East Chicago, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Beaumont Branch 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR New Orleans Branch 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Power Services : PS FS North America (US Only) 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Miner Tampa 0.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Greene County Pallets, Inc. 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE MAPLE LEAF FARMS, INC. - CROMWELL 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE EAST CHICAGO_1361684 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cafe Patachou (CP49) 26 FTE
CITY-NEAR Arcelormittal Indiana Harbor 3,844 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cleveland-Cliffs - Indiana Harbor 3,192 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ameristar East Chicago 1,371 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ameristar Casino and Hotel East Chicago 1,155 FTE
NAT-TCR Portsmouth NNSY Commissary 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Columbus Health and Rehab 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Meijer 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR GeoCare, Inc. DBA Home Instead Senior Care 0.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE 50067-Capstone Ug Portland 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE Spancrete - Newnan 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rand 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wilmington Main 26 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.