Intellectual and developmental disability homes · Massachusetts

72 Bittersweet Lane, Randolph, MA 02368

Randolph, MA · ~24 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
15.7
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

72 Bittersweet Lane, Randolph, MA 02368 runs at 412% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Intellectual and developmental disability homes workplace, earning a grade F.

72 Bittersweet Lane, Randolph, MA 02368: 15.7 TCR = 412% of Intellectual and developmental disability homes BLS 3.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

72 Bittersweet Lane, Randolph, MA 02368 safety composite

72 Bittersweet Lane, Randolph, MA 02368 scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 8%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

19/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 15.67 per 100 workers

Safer than 9% of industry peers

DART rate
F 13.57 per 100 workers

Safer than 8% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

72 Bittersweet Lane, Randolph, MA 02368: 12.8 → 20.4 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 25.8 TCR · DART/TCR 0.87× in 2023

72 Bittersweet Lane, Randolph, MA 02368's TCR rose 7.5 from 12.8 in 2018 to 20.4 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2020 at 25.8 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.87× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623210 · Randolph, MA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 15.7 · 412% of ind

  • DART 13.6 DART
  • RANK #63/74
  • PHOTO Omega Home
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 19 inj
  • SIZE ~24 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Omega Home (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Massachusetts employers → · Look up another →

72 Bittersweet Lane, Randolph, MA 02368 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows 72 Bittersweet Lane, Randolph, MA 02368 averages 15.7 TCR (412% of the Intellectual and developmental disability homes BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

72 Bittersweet Lane, Randolph, MA 02368 TCR series: 2018=12.8 · 2019=19.9 · 2020=25.8 · 2021=15.2 · 2022=0 · 2023=20.4 · BLS 3.8

Where 72 Bittersweet Lane, Randolph, MA 02368 falls in its industry

2,261 Intellectual and developmental establishments

Safer than 9% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Massachusetts alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #63 safest of 74 Intellectual and developmental employers in Massachusetts.

72 Bittersweet Lane, Randolph, MA 02368 (24 employees, TCR 15.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 5.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate 72 Bittersweet Lane, Randolph, MA 02368
72 Bittersweet Lane, Randolph, MA 02368 (24 employees, TCR 15.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 5.8

72 Bittersweet Lane, Randolph, MA 02368 has fewer employees than the Intellectual and developmental disabilit median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 20.4 13.6 3 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 15.2 12.1 5 0 0
2020 25.8 19.3 4 0 0
2019 19.9 14.9 4 0 0
2018 12.8 0.0 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623210 · MA · Randolph

2,261 Intellectual and developmental disability homes employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,108 rated employers in Massachusetts with headcount on file · 58 employers in Randolph, MA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Omega Home 15.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Inn at Deerfield 15.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR ASHLEY 15.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR EDGEWOOD CENTER 15.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Savage Farms Inc. 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE Salem Harbor Station 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE West Springfield Station 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE ATTLEBORO-MA04 24 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cox Engineering - Randolph 344 FTE
CITY-NEAR Burke Distributing Co. LLC 286 FTE
CITY-NEAR STACY'S PLANT 192 FTE
CITY-NEAR CARE ONE AT RANDOLPH 189 FTE
NAT-TCR Sumner #074 15.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Dollar General (WC USX DIN) 15.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Shepard Steel Co., Inc. - Newington 15.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Critical Environments Inc 15.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE NG Mount Holly NC 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE MCRT3 Troy 2 Tenant LLC 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hilldrup Companies, Inc.- Forestville, MD 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE Otis Elevator Company-Albuquerque 24 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.