Intellectual and developmental disability facilities (e.g., homes, hospitals, intermediate care facilities), residential · Massachusetts

80 Erdman Way

Leominster, MA · ~51 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.7
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

80 Erdman Way runs at 97% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Intellectual and developmental disability facilities (e.g., homes, hospitals, intermediate care facilities), residential workplace, earning a grade C.

80 Erdman Way: 3.7 TCR = 97% of Intellectual and developmental disability facilities (e.g., homes, hospitals, intermediate care facilities), residential BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

80 Erdman Way safety composite

80 Erdman Way scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 69% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

58/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.7 per 100 workers

Safer than 69% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.09 per 100 workers

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.2

2023→2024

80 Erdman Way injury rate improved

80 Erdman Way's TCR fell 3.2 from 5.3 in 2023 to 2.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 5.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.56× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2023=5.3 · 2024=2.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623210 · Leominster, MA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.7 · 97% of ind

  • DART 2.1 DART
  • RANK #14/74
  • PHOTO Administration Annex
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~51 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Administration Annex (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Massachusetts employers → · Look up another →

80 Erdman Way in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows 80 Erdman Way averages 3.7 TCR (97% of the Intellectual and developmental disability facilities (e.g., homes, hospitals, intermediate care facilities), residential BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

80 Erdman Way TCR series: 2023=5.3 · 2024=2.1 · BLS 3.8

Where 80 Erdman Way falls in its industry

2,261 Intellectual and developmental establishments

Safer than 69% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Massachusetts alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #14 safest of 74 Intellectual and developmental employers in Massachusetts.

80 Erdman Way (51 employees, TCR 3.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 5.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate 80 Erdman Way
80 Erdman Way (51 employees, TCR 3.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 5.8

80 Erdman Way has fewer employees than the Intellectual and developmental disabilit median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.1 2.1 1 0 0
2023 5.3 5.3 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623210 · MA · Leominster

2,261 Intellectual and developmental disability facilities (e.g., homes, hospitals, intermediate care facilities), residential employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,108 rated employers in Massachusetts with headcount on file · 107 employers in Leominster, MA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Administration Annex 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mainsl CA - Main Office Chico 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR 6443-553451 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR SL Start Seattle - 10001 3.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Benevento Sand & Stone Corp 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE Great Day Boston 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE EJ Paving Company, Inc 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lazaro Paving Corp. 51 FTE
CITY-NEAR HealthAlliance-Clinton Hospital 976 FTE
CITY-NEAR Affordable Interior Systems INC. 730 FTE
CITY-NEAR Market Basket #16 433 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 2964 333 FTE
NAT-TCR Precision Aerospace Corporation 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Berger Electric Inc. 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Glenbrook Hospital 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Northern Pride, Inc. 3.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Brookdale Memorial Oaks 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE Somerby Santa Rosa Beach 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE USA Jacksonville 2011 Rental Car Ln 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE Seattle Pacific Industries, Inc 51 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.