Construction machinery and equipment rental or leasing without operator · Kansas

81-ICT Rental

Wichita, KS · ~34 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.7
Avg TCR
1.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

81-ICT Rental runs at 50% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Construction machinery and equipment rental or leasing without operator workplace, earning a grade A.

81-ICT Rental: 0.7 TCR = 50% of Construction machinery and equipment rental or leasing without operator BLS 1.4 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

81-ICT Rental safety composite

81-ICT Rental scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 92% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

76/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.7 per 100 workers

Safer than 92% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

81-ICT Rental held a steady TCR band

81-ICT Rental's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 2.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=2.5 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=2.4 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 532412 · Wichita, KS AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.7 · 50% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1/4
  • PHOTO Herc Rental 9684
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~34 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Herc Rental 9684 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Kansas employers → · Look up another →

81-ICT Rental in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows 81-ICT Rental averages 0.7 TCR (50% of the Construction machinery and equipment rental or leasing without operator BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

81-ICT Rental TCR series: 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=2.5 · 2022=0 · 2023=2.4 · 2024=0 · BLS 1.4

Where 81-ICT Rental falls in its industry

270 Construction machinery and equ establishments

Safer than 92% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Kansas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 4 Construction machinery and equ employers in Kansas.

81-ICT Rental (34 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 37 employees and a TCR of 2.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate 81-ICT Rental
81-ICT Rental (34 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 37 employees and a TCR of 2.1

81-ICT Rental has fewer employees than the Construction machinery and equipment ren median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 2.4 0.0 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 2.5 2.5 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

532412 · KS · Wichita

270 Construction machinery and equipment rental or leasing without operator employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 5,228 rated employers in Kansas with headcount on file · 841 employers in Wichita, KS · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Herc Rental 9684 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Best Line Equipment - West Chester 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Equipmentshare.com, Inc. 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Empire Southwest, LLC - Apache Junction 0.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE High Choice Feeders LLC 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Garden City Transmission 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Emporia Service Center 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rau Construction Company 34 FTE
CITY-NEAR Spirit Aerosystems 11,775 FTE
CITY-NEAR Textron Aviation - Mid Continent 4,359 FTE
CITY-NEAR Wesley Medical Center 2,657 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1855-KSWIC062 2,438 FTE
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Southwest School Corp Fac 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Comanche County Hospital 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Lake Contracting Inc 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR SC Voc Rehab Oconee 0.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE International Dioxcide, Inc. 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE 510 - Austin 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Steel Works LLC 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE General Pet - Burnsville 34 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.