Building materials (e.g., fascia, panels, siding, soffit), plastics, manufacturing · Wisconsin

90 Schofield Door Shop - Production

Schofield, WI · ~79 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

90 Schofield Door Shop - Production runs at 278% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Building materials (e.g., fascia, panels, siding, soffit), plastics, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

90 Schofield Door Shop - Production: 9.2 TCR = 278% of Building materials (e.g., fascia, panels, siding, soffit), plastics, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

90 Schofield Door Shop - Production safety composite

90 Schofield Door Shop - Production scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 10%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

24/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.17 per 100 workers

Safer than 10% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.56 per 100 workers

Safer than 20% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−7.4

2017→2018

90 Schofield Door Shop - Production injury rate improved

90 Schofield Door Shop - Production's TCR fell 7.4 from 12.9 in 2017 to 5.5 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2017 at 12.9 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0.5× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=12.9 · 2018=5.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 326199 · Schofield, WI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 9.2 · 278% of ind

  • DART 4.6 DART
  • RANK #155/166
  • PHOTO BWAY Leominster
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 17 inj
  • SIZE ~79 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: BWAY Leominster (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

90 Schofield Door Shop - Production in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows 90 Schofield Door Shop - Production averages 9.2 TCR (278% of the Building materials (e.g., fascia, panels, siding, soffit), plastics, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

90 Schofield Door Shop - Production TCR series: 2017=12.9 · 2018=5.5 · BLS 3.3

Where 90 Schofield Door Shop - Production falls in its industry

2,838 Building materials (e.g., fasc establishments

Safer than 10% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #155 safest of 166 Building materials (e.g., fasc employers in Wisconsin.

90 Schofield Door Shop - Production (79 employees, TCR 9.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 101 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate 90 Schofield Door Shop - Production
90 Schofield Door Shop - Production (79 employees, TCR 9.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 101 employees and a TCR of 3.5

90 Schofield Door Shop - Production has fewer employees than the Building materials (e.g., fascia, panels median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 5.5 4.6 6 0 0
2017 12.9 10.5 11 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

326199 · WI · Schofield

2,838 Building materials (e.g., fascia, panels, siding, soffit), plastics, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 59 employers in Schofield, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR BWAY Leominster 9.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR North America : Stayton 9.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Chem-Tainer - Cranston 9.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Dutchland - WI 9.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Oakbrook 79 FTE
STATE-SIZE Capitol Mechanical, Inc. 79 FTE
STATE-SIZE Butter Buds Inc. 79 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cady Cheese, LLC 79 FTE
CITY-NEAR Greenheck Fan Corporation 2,237 FTE
CITY-NEAR Schofield Facility 615 FTE
CITY-NEAR Crystal Finishing Systems - Schofield 607 FTE
CITY-NEAR Asplundh Tree Expert LLC - 062 438 FTE
NAT-TCR Grant 9.2 TCR
NAT-TCR NC089 9.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Bonnet Creek - Resort 9.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Fire Station #2 9.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Cascades - IFC Disposables Inc. 79 FTE
NAT-SIZE The John Clarke Retirement Center 79 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fairfield Works - Flat Rolled 79 FTE
NAT-SIZE Legends - Jiffy Lube Live 79 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.