Scheduled Passenger Air Transportation · Minnesota

90060008 Hubert Humphrey Terminal 2 - Msp

Minneapolis, MN · ~679 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
45.3
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

90060008 Hubert Humphrey Terminal 2 - Msp runs at 1008% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Scheduled Passenger Air Transportation workplace, earning a grade F.

90060008 Hubert Humphrey Terminal 2 - Msp: 45.3 TCR = 1008% of Scheduled Passenger Air Transportation BLS 4.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

90060008 Hubert Humphrey Terminal 2 - Msp safety composite

90060008 Hubert Humphrey Terminal 2 - Msp scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 0%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

13/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 45.34 per 100 workers

Safer than 0% of industry peers

DART rate
F 38.16 per 100 workers

Safer than 0% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

90060008 Hubert Humphrey Terminal 2 - Msp: 45.3 → 266.5 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 266.5 TCR · DART/TCR 4.86× in 2024

90060008 Hubert Humphrey Terminal 2 - Msp's TCR rose 221.2 from 45.3 in 2023 to 266.5 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 4.86× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 481111 · Minneapolis, MN ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 45.3 · 1008% of ind

  • DART 220.2 DART
  • RANK #31/31
  • PHOTO EWR - Ground Ops
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 159 inj
  • SIZE ~679 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: EWR - Ground Ops (15.4 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

90060008 Hubert Humphrey Terminal 2 - Msp in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows 90060008 Hubert Humphrey Terminal 2 - Msp averages 45.3 TCR (1008% of the Scheduled Passenger Air Transportation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

90060008 Hubert Humphrey Terminal 2 - Msp TCR series: 2023=45.3 · 2024=266.5 · BLS 4.5

Where 90060008 Hubert Humphrey Terminal 2 - Msp falls in its industry

1,568 Scheduled Passenger Air Transp establishments

Safer than 0% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #31 safest of 31 Scheduled Passenger Air Transp employers in Minnesota.

90060008 Hubert Humphrey Terminal 2 - Msp (679 employees, TCR 45.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 6.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 01020304050 Average employees Total Case Rate 90060008 Hubert Humphrey Terminal 2 - Msp
90060008 Hubert Humphrey Terminal 2 - Msp (679 employees, TCR 45.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 6.1

90060008 Hubert Humphrey Terminal 2 - Msp has more employees than the Scheduled Passenger Air Transportation median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 266.5 220.2 64 5 0
2023 45.3 38.2 95 6 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

481111 · MN · Minneapolis

1,568 Scheduled Passenger Air Transportation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 1,321 employers in Minneapolis, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR EWR - Ground Ops 30.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR DTW-GROUND OPS 29.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bellingham Horizon 29.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR BDL - Ground Ops 29.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Paving Products Brooklyn Park 679 FTE
STATE-SIZE Medivators - MN 680 FTE
STATE-SIZE PILGRIMS COLD SPRING - JFC- LLC 677 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2272-22720281 677 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Minnesota Twin Cities 22,522 FTE
CITY-NEAR MN950 MN TELECOMMUTER 12,021 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0501 - City Center 8,459 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hennepin County Medical Center 7,030 FTE
NAT-TCR 048 Juvenile Detention Center 30.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Governor Juan F. Luis Hospital and Medical Center 30.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Rockland Facility 30.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Kemper Moving Systems 30.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Ohcol - Obetz 679 FTE
NAT-SIZE Stellant Systems, Inc 679 FTE
NAT-SIZE City of Casper 679 FTE
NAT-SIZE Logan Corporate 679 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.