Alpine skiing facilities with accommodations (i.e. ski resorts) · Colorado

9277-120 Beaver Creek Resort

Avon, CO · ~1,638 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
6.2
Avg TCR
3.0
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

9277-120 Beaver Creek Resort runs at 206% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Alpine skiing facilities with accommodations (i.e. ski resorts) workplace, earning a grade F.

9277-120 Beaver Creek Resort: 6.2 TCR = 206% of Alpine skiing facilities with accommodations (i.e. ski resorts) BLS 3.0 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

9277-120 Beaver Creek Resort safety composite

9277-120 Beaver Creek Resort scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 27%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

36/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 6.19 per 100 workers

Safer than 36% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.35 per 100 workers

Safer than 27% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

9277-120 Beaver Creek Resort: 4.6 → 5.7 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 8.3 TCR · DART/TCR 0.7× in 2022

9277-120 Beaver Creek Resort's TCR rose 1.1 from 4.6 in 2020 to 5.7 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2021 at 8.3 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.7× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 721110 · Avon, CO ABOVE-IND · LARGE

Grade F · TCR 6.2 · 206% of ind

  • DART 4.3 DART
  • RANK #177/308
  • PHOTO Arrive Wilmington
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 99 inj
  • SIZE ~1,638 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Arrive Wilmington (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Colorado employers → · Look up another →

9277-120 Beaver Creek Resort in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows 9277-120 Beaver Creek Resort averages 6.2 TCR (206% of the Alpine skiing facilities with accommodations (i.e. ski resorts) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

9277-120 Beaver Creek Resort TCR series: 2020=4.6 · 2021=8.3 · 2022=5.7 · BLS 3.0

Where 9277-120 Beaver Creek Resort falls in its industry

9,342 Alpine skiing facilities with establishments

Safer than 36% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Colorado alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #177 safest of 308 Alpine skiing facilities with employers in Colorado.

9277-120 Beaver Creek Resort (1,638 employees, TCR 6.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 4.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate 9277-120 Beaver Creek Resort
9277-120 Beaver Creek Resort (1,638 employees, TCR 6.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 4.8

9277-120 Beaver Creek Resort has more employees than the Alpine skiing facilities with accommodat median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 5.7 4.3 39 0 0
2021 8.3 5.7 39 2 0
2020 4.6 2.8 21 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

721110 · CO · Avon

9,342 Alpine skiing facilities with accommodations (i.e. ski resorts) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,007 rated employers in Colorado with headcount on file · 29 employers in Avon, CO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Arrive Wilmington 6.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR HILTON GARDEN INN OGDEN 6.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR MCAZ Associates LLC 6.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR 4263-15169 6.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Sturgeon Electric Company, Inc. C&I 1,636 FTE
STATE-SIZE 05070001-050712 ST FRANCIS HOSPITAL - EAST 1,603 FTE
STATE-SIZE Amazon.com Services LLC - DEN5 1,601 FTE
STATE-SIZE Terumo BCT - Lakewood 1,599 FTE
CITY-NEAR 120 BEAVER CREEK RESORT 1,536 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ski School (Kids) - Beaver Creek 620 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ski School (Adults) - Beaver Creek 468 FTE
CITY-NEAR Reception Center - Beaver Creek 317 FTE
NAT-TCR 403889-Hil-Hillsboro Anx 6.2 TCR
NAT-TCR 052865-FRE-DDU 6.2 TCR
NAT-TCR 285424-Monett Po 6.2 TCR
NAT-TCR 481374-Hou-Medical Center 6.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE TSV Augusta East 1,638 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tower Health Medical Group 1,638 FTE
NAT-SIZE APM Terminals Pacific LLC 1,638 FTE
NAT-SIZE Elkhorn Packing CO LLC 1,638 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.