Alpine skiing facilities with accommodations (i.e. ski resorts) · California

9277-501 Heavenly Tram Base

South Lake Tahoe, CA · ~56 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.9
Avg TCR
3.0
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

9277-501 Heavenly Tram Base runs at 63% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Alpine skiing facilities with accommodations (i.e. ski resorts) workplace, earning a grade B.

9277-501 Heavenly Tram Base: 1.9 TCR = 63% of Alpine skiing facilities with accommodations (i.e. ski resorts) BLS 3.0 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

9277-501 Heavenly Tram Base safety composite

9277-501 Heavenly Tram Base scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 86% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

74/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.89 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

9277-501 Heavenly Tram Base: 0.0 → 3.8 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 3.8 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2022

9277-501 Heavenly Tram Base's TCR rose 3.8 from 0.0 in 2020 to 3.8 in 2022. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 721110 · South Lake Tahoe, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 1.9 · 63% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #66/1298
  • PHOTO Homewood Suites Dayt…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~56 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Homewood Suites Daytona (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

9277-501 Heavenly Tram Base in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows 9277-501 Heavenly Tram Base averages 1.9 TCR (63% of the Alpine skiing facilities with accommodations (i.e. ski resorts) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-09-26

9277-501 Heavenly Tram Base TCR series: 2020=0 · 2022=3.8 · BLS 3.0

Where 9277-501 Heavenly Tram Base falls in its industry

9,342 Alpine skiing facilities with establishments

Safer than 86% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #66 safest of 1298 Alpine skiing facilities with employers in California.

9277-501 Heavenly Tram Base (56 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 4.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate 9277-501 Heavenly Tram Base
9277-501 Heavenly Tram Base (56 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 4.8

9277-501 Heavenly Tram Base has more employees than the Alpine skiing facilities with accommodat median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 3.8 0.0 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

721110 · CA · South Lake Tahoe

9,342 Alpine skiing facilities with accommodations (i.e. ski resorts) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 55 employers in South Lake Tahoe, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Homewood Suites Daytona 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Westin Indianapolis 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR 41-Doubletree Hotel Cincinnati Airport 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Springhill Suites 1.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Elegance at Berkeley 56 FTE
STATE-SIZE NEDL DSP-Amazon 56 FTE
STATE-SIZE South Of Nick's Laguna Beach (SONLB) 56 FTE
STATE-SIZE Yuba County Juvenile Hall/Camp Singer 56 FTE
CITY-NEAR 9277-500 HEAVENLY CALIFORNIA MAIN LODGE 651 FTE
CITY-NEAR Barton Memorial Hospital 597 FTE
CITY-NEAR 500 HEAVENLY CALIFORNIA MAIN LODGE 437 FTE
CITY-NEAR 9277-502 HEAVENLY GONDOLA BASE CA 272 FTE
NAT-TCR Fortune Plastic & Metal 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR 04-24-02 Northeast Div - Hudson Region 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR LaVezzi Precision, Inc. 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Piggly Wiggly #556 1.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE 9277-210 Flagg Ranch 56 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kreider Farms - Mt. Pleasant 56 FTE
NAT-SIZE Easterseals - 435 S Main St-Manchester 56 FTE
NAT-SIZE ISD 485 Royalton Elementary 56 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.