School and employee bus transportation · Maryland

97390001-Lot33 Boe - Lot 33 - Surrattsville

Clinton, MD · ~132 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.6
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

97390001-Lot33 Boe - Lot 33 - Surrattsville runs at 146% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical School and employee bus transportation workplace, earning a grade D.

97390001-Lot33 Boe - Lot 33 - Surrattsville: 6.6 TCR = 146% of School and employee bus transportation BLS 4.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

97390001-Lot33 Boe - Lot 33 - Surrattsville safety composite

97390001-Lot33 Boe - Lot 33 - Surrattsville scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 23%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

33/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.59 per 100 workers

Safer than 23% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.78 per 100 workers

Safer than 33% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.1

2023→2024

97390001-Lot33 Boe - Lot 33 - Surrattsville injury rate improved

97390001-Lot33 Boe - Lot 33 - Surrattsville's TCR fell 4.1 from 8.6 in 2023 to 4.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 8.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.57× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2023=8.6 · 2024=4.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 485410 · Clinton, MD ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 6.6 · 146% of ind

  • DART 3.8 DART
  • RANK #23/33
  • PHOTO DOT Bethesda Transp …
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 14 inj
  • SIZE ~132 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: DOT Bethesda Transp Depot (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Maryland employers → · Look up another →

97390001-Lot33 Boe - Lot 33 - Surrattsville in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows 97390001-Lot33 Boe - Lot 33 - Surrattsville averages 6.6 TCR (146% of the School and employee bus transportation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

97390001-Lot33 Boe - Lot 33 - Surrattsville TCR series: 2023=8.6 · 2024=4.5 · BLS 4.5

Where 97390001-Lot33 Boe - Lot 33 - Surrattsville falls in its industry

1,574 School and employee bus transp establishments

Safer than 23% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Maryland alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #23 safest of 33 School and employee bus transp employers in Maryland.

97390001-Lot33 Boe - Lot 33 - Surrattsville (132 employees, TCR 6.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 4.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate 97390001-Lot33 Boe - Lot 33 - Surrattsville
97390001-Lot33 Boe - Lot 33 - Surrattsville (132 employees, TCR 6.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 4.3

97390001-Lot33 Boe - Lot 33 - Surrattsville has more employees than the School and employee bus transportation median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.5 3.8 6 0 0
2023 8.6 4.3 8 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

485410 · MD · Clinton

1,574 School and employee bus transportation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,213 rated employers in Maryland with headcount on file · 29 employers in Clinton, MD · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR DOT Bethesda Transp Depot 6.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Southern lehigh Terminal 6.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR All-Star-Newtown 6.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR 2009 WEST REGION-CARSON 6.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Coakley Williams - Head Office 132 FTE
STATE-SIZE East Regional Rebar, Inc 132 FTE
STATE-SIZE GAC Services 132 FTE
STATE-SIZE Otis Elevator Company-DC NE 132 FTE
CITY-NEAR Medstar Southern Maryland Hospital 1,419 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mona Electric Group Inc 724 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2799 337 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 2799 291 FTE
NAT-TCR Store 105 6.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Byron 6.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Westminster Commons 6.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 3043 Cash Wise Minot 6.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Liberty Univ Starbucks 132 FTE
NAT-SIZE Store 037 132 FTE
NAT-SIZE Edgar P. Benjamin Healthcare Center INC 132 FTE
NAT-SIZE El Paso Health and Rehabilitation 132 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.