Vegetable and melon farming, potato dominant crop, field and seed production · Arizona

A. Oseguera Company

Yuma, AZ · ~20 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
10.3
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

A. Oseguera Company runs at 229% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Vegetable and melon farming, potato dominant crop, field and seed production workplace, earning a grade F.

A. Oseguera Company: 10.3 TCR = 229% of Vegetable and melon farming, potato dominant crop, field and seed production BLS 4.5 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

A. Oseguera Company safety composite

A. Oseguera Company scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 54% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 11%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

35/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.31 per 100 workers

Safer than 11% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.85 per 100 workers

Safer than 49% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 54% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.2

2018→2024

A. Oseguera Company injury rate improved

A. Oseguera Company's TCR fell 1.2 from 4.0 in 2018 to 2.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 39.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.18× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=4.0 · 2019=3.3 · 2020=6.0 · 2021=39.1 · 2022=3.6 · 2023=13.4 · 2024=2.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 111211 · Yuma, AZ ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 10.3 · 229% of ind

  • DART 1.9 DART
  • RANK #5/5
  • PHOTO Walther Farms NE
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 48 inj
  • SIZE ~20 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Walther Farms NE (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

A. Oseguera Company in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows A. Oseguera Company averages 10.3 TCR (229% of the Vegetable and melon farming, potato dominant crop, field and seed production BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

A. Oseguera Company TCR series: 2018=4 · 2019=3.3 · 2020=6 · 2021=39.1 · 2022=3.6 · 2023=13.4 · 2024=2.8 · BLS 4.5

Where A. Oseguera Company falls in its industry

153 Vegetable and melon farming, p establishments

Safer than 11% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 5 Vegetable and melon farming, p employers in Arizona.

A. Oseguera Company (20 employees, TCR 10.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 5.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate A. Oseguera Company
A. Oseguera Company (20 employees, TCR 10.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 5.1

A. Oseguera Company has fewer employees than the Vegetable and melon farming, potato domi median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.8 1.9 3 0 0
2023 13.4 10.7 5 0 0
2022 3.6 2.1 5 0 0
2021 39.1 14.2 10 1 0
2020 6.0 3.3 10 1 0
2019 3.3 2.8 7 0 0
2018 4.0 2.5 8 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

111211 · AZ · Yuma

153 Vegetable and melon farming, potato dominant crop, field and seed production employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 274 employers in Yuma, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Walther Farms NE 10.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cold Springs Dairy LLC 10.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hoverson Farms 9.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Weber Farms 9.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Animal Nutrition Systems - ANS12 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE Animal Nutrition Systems (Plant) - ANSP581 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tucson Corporate Office 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wickenburg 20 FTE
CITY-NEAR Primetime Harvesting Inc 2,271 FTE
CITY-NEAR Foothill Packing- Arizona 2,175 FTE
CITY-NEAR Yuma Regional Medical Center 1,757 FTE
CITY-NEAR PGM PACKING INC 1,423 FTE
NAT-TCR Brookdale Park Place 10.3 TCR
NAT-TCR People's Linen Service Forge St 10.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Silverado Belmont Hills - 214 10.3 TCR
NAT-TCR New Stanton, Pa Branch 10.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Anderson Moran Construction 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE River City Builders & Millworks, Inc. 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE Southern Recycling LLC Lafayette 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE Family Health Center ZSFGH 20 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.