Agricultural machinery and equipment repair and maintenance services · New Jersey

A & S Boiler and Burner Corporation

Newark, NJ · ~23 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
14.5
Avg TCR
2.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

A & S Boiler and Burner Corporation runs at 689% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Agricultural machinery and equipment repair and maintenance services workplace, earning a grade F.

A & S Boiler and Burner Corporation: 14.5 TCR = 689% of Agricultural machinery and equipment repair and maintenance services BLS 2.1 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

A & S Boiler and Burner Corporation safety composite

A & S Boiler and Burner Corporation scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

18/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 14.46 per 100 workers

Safer than 1% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.68 per 100 workers

Safer than 13% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−10.2

2017→2018

A & S Boiler and Burner Corporation injury rate improved

A & S Boiler and Burner Corporation's TCR fell 10.2 from 19.6 in 2017 to 9.4 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2017 at 19.6 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0.32× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=19.6 · 2018=9.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 811310 · Newark, NJ ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 14.5 · 689% of ind

  • DART 4.7 DART
  • RANK #47/47
  • PHOTO Whaley Foodservice-C…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~23 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Whaley Foodservice-Charlotte (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Jersey employers → · Look up another →

A & S Boiler and Burner Corporation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows A & S Boiler and Burner Corporation averages 14.5 TCR (689% of the Agricultural machinery and equipment repair and maintenance services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

A & S Boiler and Burner Corporation TCR series: 2017=19.6 · 2018=9.4 · BLS 2.1

Where A & S Boiler and Burner Corporation falls in its industry

2,560 Agricultural machinery and equ establishments

Safer than 1% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Jersey alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #47 safest of 47 Agricultural machinery and equ employers in New Jersey.

A & S Boiler and Burner Corporation (23 employees, TCR 14.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate A & S Boiler and Burner Corporation
A & S Boiler and Burner Corporation (23 employees, TCR 14.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7

A & S Boiler and Burner Corporation has fewer employees than the Agricultural machinery and equipment rep median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 9.4 4.7 2 0 0
2017 19.6 19.6 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

811310 · NJ · Newark

2,560 Agricultural machinery and equipment repair and maintenance services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 11,201 rated employers in New Jersey with headcount on file · 356 employers in Newark, NJ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Whaley Foodservice-Charlotte 14.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Washington Marine Cleaning, LLC 13.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR CoolSys C&I Corpus/Valley Service 13.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR St. Paul Branch 15.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE NAES : Newark Energy Center 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE Newark Energy Center 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE Coli Construction, Inc. 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE Skyline Solar Hamilton, NJ Office 23 FTE
CITY-NEAR EWR EWR 13,545 FTE
CITY-NEAR EWR - Airport United Airlines Offices 13,015 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6925-EWR 11,764 FTE
CITY-NEAR EWRPW9829 EWR - NON AA PAX SER 4,772 FTE
NAT-TCR Landing of Springboro 14.5 TCR
NAT-TCR 560 ABC Supply Co., Inc. 14.5 TCR
NAT-TCR 4795-PD-SDF-LOUISVILLE-PD 14.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Morris (Mnmor) 14.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Hawkeye Ready Mix Coralville 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dayton CPC 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE D.G.M., Inc. 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Residence inn Carmel 23 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.