Air purification equipment, stationary, manufacturing · North Carolina

AAF Flanders FFI

Washington, NC · ~292 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

AAF Flanders FFI runs at 42% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Air purification equipment, stationary, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

AAF Flanders FFI: 1.4 TCR = 42% of Air purification equipment, stationary, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

AAF Flanders FFI safety composite

AAF Flanders FFI scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 81% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

67/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.39 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.38 per 100 workers

Safer than 62% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.9

2016→2024

AAF Flanders FFI injury rate improved

AAF Flanders FFI's TCR fell 0.9 from 2.4 in 2016 to 1.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 3.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.27× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.4 · 2017=0.9 · 2018=3.3 · 2019=0.6 · 2020=0.7 · 2021=0.3 · 2022=1.3 · 2023=1.4 · 2024=1.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333413 · Washington, NC AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.4 · 42% of ind

  • DART 0.4 DART
  • RANK #5/18
  • PHOTO QC Manufacturing
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 35 inj
  • SIZE ~292 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: QC Manufacturing (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

AAF Flanders FFI in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows AAF Flanders FFI averages 1.4 TCR (42% of the Air purification equipment, stationary, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

AAF Flanders FFI TCR series: 2016=2.4 · 2017=0.9 · 2018=3.3 · 2019=0.6 · 2020=0.7 · 2021=0.3 · 2022=1.3 · 2023=1.4 · 2024=1.5 · BLS 3.3

Where AAF Flanders FFI falls in its industry

232 Air purification equipment, st establishments

Safer than 81% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 18 Air purification equipment, st employers in North Carolina.

AAF Flanders FFI (292 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 85 employees and a TCR of 3.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate AAF Flanders FFI
AAF Flanders FFI (292 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 85 employees and a TCR of 3.1

AAF Flanders FFI has more employees than the Air purification equipment, stationary, median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.5 0.4 4 0 0
2023 1.4 0.7 3 1 0
2022 1.3 1.3 4 0 0
2021 0.3 0.3 1 0 0
2020 0.7 0.7 2 0 0
2019 0.6 0.6 2 0 0
2018 3.3 2.5 8 0 0
2017 0.9 0.6 3 0 0
2016 2.4 1.2 8 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333413 · NC · Washington

232 Air purification equipment, stationary, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 55 employers in Washington, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR QC Manufacturing 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Attic Breeze LLC 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Howden American Fan Company 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Koch Filter East Greenville 1.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE HP - High Performance 292 FTE
STATE-SIZE 1613 292 FTE
STATE-SIZE WM 1614 292 FTE
STATE-SIZE Environmental Holdings Group 292 FTE
CITY-NEAR ECU Health Beaufort Hospital 758 FTE
CITY-NEAR Vidant Beaufort Hospital 576 FTE
CITY-NEAR Beaufort County Community College 383 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1354 317 FTE
NAT-TCR The STI Group Fab, SM 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Beitzel Corporation 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR The Republic 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Smith County Middle School 1.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE United Church of Christ Retirement Community d.b.a. Havenwood Heritage Heights 292 FTE
NAT-SIZE R&D Thiel 292 FTE
NAT-SIZE Grand Prairie 292 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lennar Las Vegas 292 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.