Air purification equipment, stationary, manufacturing · North Carolina

AAF Flanders Smithfield

Smithfield, NC · ~428 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

AAF Flanders Smithfield runs at 87% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Air purification equipment, stationary, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

AAF Flanders Smithfield: 2.9 TCR = 87% of Air purification equipment, stationary, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

AAF Flanders Smithfield safety composite

AAF Flanders Smithfield scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 63% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

57/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.87 per 100 workers

Safer than 55% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.36 per 100 workers

Safer than 63% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.4

2016→2024

AAF Flanders Smithfield injury rate improved

AAF Flanders Smithfield's TCR fell 0.4 from 1.1 in 2016 to 0.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 6.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.13× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=1.1 · 2017=6.1 · 2018=5.9 · 2019=2.5 · 2020=3.7 · 2021=1.9 · 2022=2.2 · 2023=1.7 · 2024=0.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333413 · Smithfield, NC AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 2.9 · 87% of ind

  • DART 0.4 DART
  • RANK #11/18
  • PHOTO Trion IAQ
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 125 inj
  • SIZE ~428 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Trion IAQ (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

AAF Flanders Smithfield in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows AAF Flanders Smithfield averages 2.9 TCR (87% of the Air purification equipment, stationary, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

AAF Flanders Smithfield TCR series: 2016=1.1 · 2017=6.1 · 2018=5.9 · 2019=2.5 · 2020=3.7 · 2021=1.9 · 2022=2.2 · 2023=1.7 · 2024=0.7 · BLS 3.3

Where AAF Flanders Smithfield falls in its industry

232 Air purification equipment, st establishments

Safer than 55% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #11 safest of 18 Air purification equipment, st employers in North Carolina.

AAF Flanders Smithfield (428 employees, TCR 2.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 85 employees and a TCR of 3.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate AAF Flanders Smithfield
AAF Flanders Smithfield (428 employees, TCR 2.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 85 employees and a TCR of 3.1

AAF Flanders Smithfield has more employees than the Air purification equipment, stationary, median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.7 0.4 2 0 0
2023 1.7 1.0 5 0 0
2022 2.2 1.7 8 0 0
2021 1.9 0.8 7 0 0
2020 3.7 3.3 15 1 0
2019 2.5 1.6 13 0 0
2018 5.9 4.5 33 0 0
2017 6.1 4.2 36 3 0
2016 1.1 0.5 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333413 · NC · Smithfield

232 Air purification equipment, stationary, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 62 employers in Smithfield, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Trion IAQ 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Freudenberg Filtration Technologies (Filters Now) Saraland, Alabama 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Dampers OK 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Filters Now, LLC 2.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Pinetops - 3022 NC 43 North 428 FTE
STATE-SIZE United Technology Aerospace Systems- Corp Office 428 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2576-544 428 FTE
STATE-SIZE Maxwell Foods Goldsboro Hog Farms 427 FTE
CITY-NEAR Johnston Health 1,593 FTE
CITY-NEAR Government Complex (County Courts, Administration & Law Enforcement Buildings) 790 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 1321 401 FTE
CITY-NEAR OPW Retail Fueling - Smithfield 395 FTE
NAT-TCR DeRoyal Textiles, Inc. 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Herbert F. Darling, Inc. 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR RAM 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Giant Eagle #6519 2.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Southwest Shipyard Brady Island 428 FTE
NAT-SIZE CLARKSVILLE 428 FTE
NAT-SIZE Franklin 428 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lansing SC 428 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.