Hydroponic crop farming · Arizona

ABACA

Phoenix, AZ · ~28 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.1
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

ABACA runs at 24% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Hydroponic crop farming workplace, earning a grade A.

ABACA: 1.1 TCR = 24% of Hydroponic crop farming BLS 4.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

ABACA safety composite

ABACA scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 95% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

80/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 1.1 per 100 workers

Safer than 95% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 83% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.3

2022→2024

ABACA injury rate improved

ABACA's TCR fell 3.3 from 3.3 in 2022 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 3.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=3.3 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 111419 · Phoenix, AZ AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.1 · 24% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #2/15
  • PHOTO Columbia Care New Yo…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~28 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Columbia Care New York LLC.-Rochester (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

ABACA in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows ABACA averages 1.1 TCR (24% of the Hydroponic crop farming BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

ABACA TCR series: 2022=3.3 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 4.5

Where ABACA falls in its industry

251 Hydroponic crop farming establishments

Safer than 95% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 15 Hydroponic crop farming employers in Arizona.

ABACA (28 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 75 employees and a TCR of 4.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate ABACA
ABACA (28 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 75 employees and a TCR of 4.9

ABACA has fewer employees than the Hydroponic crop farming median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 3.3 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

111419 · AZ · Phoenix

251 Hydroponic crop farming employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 2,630 employers in Phoenix, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Columbia Care New York LLC.-Rochester 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Acres Cultivation 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Village farms Marfa 1 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fairhaven Retail Dispensary and Offices 1.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Tatum 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tonopah 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cholla Livestock 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE MARICOPA PLANT 28 FTE
CITY-NEAR Maricopa County 15,504 FTE
CITY-NEAR Phoenix Children's Hospital 7,575 FTE
CITY-NEAR All Company 6,261 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6403-64030500 6,153 FTE
NAT-TCR Mile High Labs - Broomfield 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Baxter Healthcare - Milwaukee 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Nc Hq 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR A. W. Farrell & Son, Inc. - Cleveland 1.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE At Home Stores #323 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE At Home Store #318 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE At Home Store #317 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Waterway Plant 28 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.