Drilling rigs, oil and gas field-type, manufacturing · Texas

Abaco Drilling Technologies

Houston, TX · ~152 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Abaco Drilling Technologies runs at 70% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Drilling rigs, oil and gas field-type, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Abaco Drilling Technologies: 2.3 TCR = 70% of Drilling rigs, oil and gas field-type, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Abaco Drilling Technologies safety composite

Abaco Drilling Technologies scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 26%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

37/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 2.31 per 100 workers

Safer than 26% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.52 per 100 workers

Safer than 41% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Abaco Drilling Technologies held a steady TCR band

Abaco Drilling Technologies's TCR held near 0.2 from 0.8 in 2020 to 1.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 4.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.23× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=0.8 · 2021=2.1 · 2022=4.5 · 2023=3.0 · 2024=1.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333132 · Houston, TX AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.3 · 70% of ind

  • DART 0.5 DART
  • RANK #167/208
  • PHOTO Oil States Industrie…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 19 inj
  • SIZE ~152 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Oil States Industries Inc. Lampasas Business Unit (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Abaco Drilling Technologies in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Abaco Drilling Technologies averages 2.3 TCR (70% of the Drilling rigs, oil and gas field-type, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Abaco Drilling Technologies TCR series: 2020=0.8 · 2021=2.1 · 2022=4.5 · 2023=3 · 2024=1 · BLS 3.3

Where Abaco Drilling Technologies falls in its industry

316 Drilling rigs, oil and gas fie establishments

Safer than 26% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #167 safest of 208 Drilling rigs, oil and gas fie employers in Texas.

Abaco Drilling Technologies (152 employees, TCR 2.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 1.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Abaco Drilling Technologies
Abaco Drilling Technologies (152 employees, TCR 2.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 1.3

Abaco Drilling Technologies has more employees than the Drilling rigs, oil and gas field-type, m median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.0 0.5 2 0 0
2023 3.0 1.8 5 0 0
2022 4.5 2.8 8 0 0
2021 2.1 1.4 3 0 0
2020 0.8 0.8 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333132 · TX · Houston

316 Drilling rigs, oil and gas field-type, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 5,116 employers in Houston, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Oil States Industries Inc. Lampasas Business Unit 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR National Oilwell Varco- Houston Rig Pressure Control- Baytown 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pampa Operations 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Innovex Downhole Solutions Midland OH 2.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Burk Royalty Co. LTD 152 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bosque Disposal Systems LLC 152 FTE
STATE-SIZE Chase Center 152 FTE
STATE-SIZE Civil Mechanical Clute 152 FTE
CITY-NEAR IAH IAH 11,560 FTE
CITY-NEAR IAH - Airport United Airlines Offices 10,239 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6925-IAH 9,442 FTE
CITY-NEAR Houston Methodist Hospital Texas Medical Center 8,873 FTE
NAT-TCR Colonial Oaks Health & Rehab 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Chicago GPP 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR EMSI, Inc 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Store 1074 2.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Ashton Creek Nursing & Rehab. 152 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wren Manufacturing Inc - 1070 Hanover Street 152 FTE
NAT-SIZE Store 0118 152 FTE
NAT-SIZE Store 0133 152 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.