Environmental remediation services · Ohio

Abatement and Mitigation Services

Columbus, OH · ~32 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
3.3
Avg TCR
2.6
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Abatement and Mitigation Services runs at 125% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Environmental remediation services workplace, earning a grade D.

Abatement and Mitigation Services: 3.3 TCR = 125% of Environmental remediation services BLS 2.6 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Abatement and Mitigation Services safety composite

Abatement and Mitigation Services scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 70% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 29%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

49/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 3.25 per 100 workers

Safer than 29% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.9

2019→2023

Abatement and Mitigation Services injury rate improved

Abatement and Mitigation Services's TCR fell 3.9 from 3.9 in 2019 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2021 at 6.3 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=3.9 · 2020=6.0 · 2021=6.3 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 562910 · Columbus, OH ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 3.3 · 125% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #19/24
  • PHOTO Dickson Company
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~32 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Dickson Company (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Abatement and Mitigation Services in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Abatement and Mitigation Services averages 3.3 TCR (125% of the Environmental remediation services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Abatement and Mitigation Services TCR series: 2019=3.9 · 2020=6 · 2021=6.3 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · BLS 2.6

Where Abatement and Mitigation Services falls in its industry

672 Environmental remediation serv establishments

Safer than 29% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #19 safest of 24 Environmental remediation serv employers in Ohio.

Abatement and Mitigation Services (32 employees, TCR 3.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 50 employees and a TCR of 1.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Abatement and Mitigation Services
Abatement and Mitigation Services (32 employees, TCR 3.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 50 employees and a TCR of 1.8

Abatement and Mitigation Services has fewer employees than the Environmental remediation services median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 6.3 0.0 1 0 0
2020 6.0 6.0 1 0 0
2019 3.9 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

562910 · OH · Columbus

672 Environmental remediation services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 1,500 employers in Columbus, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Dickson Company 3.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR A&D Environmental Services (SC), LLC. 3.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Colfax Corporation 3.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR BU# 109 3.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Custom Agri Systems - Upper Sandusky 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tiffin Svc Ctr 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE Delaware Svc Ctr 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE Midwest Electric, Inc. 32 FTE
CITY-NEAR Nationwide Children's Hospital 13,367 FTE
CITY-NEAR Nationwide Children's Hospital Main Campus 10,116 FTE
CITY-NEAR Riverside Methodist Hospital 9,759 FTE
CITY-NEAR North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : CMH1 5,057 FTE
NAT-TCR Delaney Associates, LP 3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR TCSI-Transland 3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR McElroy's Inc 3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Grunwald Mechanical Contractors & Engineers 3.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Jansen Cable Construction, Inc. 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Spiral Metals Corp of BR 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Taddiken Tree Company 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE K.W.Boring, Inc. 32 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.