Asbestos abatement services · California

Absolute Abatement & Demolition

Santa Fe Springs, CA · ~22 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.0
Avg TCR
2.6
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Absolute Abatement & Demolition runs at 155% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Asbestos abatement services workplace, earning a grade D.

Absolute Abatement & Demolition: 4.0 TCR = 155% of Asbestos abatement services BLS 2.6 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Absolute Abatement & Demolition safety composite

Absolute Abatement & Demolition scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 70% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 21%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

45/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.02 per 100 workers

Safer than 21% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Absolute Abatement & Demolition held a steady TCR band

Absolute Abatement & Demolition's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 12.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=0.0 · 2019=11.2 · 2020=12.9 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 562910 · Santa Fe Springs, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.0 · 155% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #46/68
  • PHOTO ARSI
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~22 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: ARSI (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Absolute Abatement & Demolition in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Absolute Abatement & Demolition averages 4.0 TCR (155% of the Asbestos abatement services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Absolute Abatement & Demolition TCR series: 2017=0 · 2019=11.2 · 2020=12.9 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.6

Where Absolute Abatement & Demolition falls in its industry

672 Asbestos abatement services establishments

Safer than 21% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #46 safest of 68 Asbestos abatement services employers in California.

Absolute Abatement & Demolition (22 employees, TCR 4.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 50 employees and a TCR of 1.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Absolute Abatement & Demolition
Absolute Abatement & Demolition (22 employees, TCR 4.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 50 employees and a TCR of 1.8

Absolute Abatement & Demolition has fewer employees than the Asbestos abatement services median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 12.9 4.3 3 0 0
2019 11.2 11.2 3 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

562910 · CA · Santa Fe Springs

672 Asbestos abatement services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 310 employers in Santa Fe Springs, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR ARSI 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Earth Resource Group 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR West Central Environmental Consultants - Morris 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR DELTA/BJDS, INC 4.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE LaGrande Farms 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Del Carlo Farms, Inc. 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Linda Vista Farms 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE MOUNTAIN VIEW FARM SHOP 22 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 423 3,217 FTE
CITY-NEAR CSI Electrical Contractors, Inc. 1,217 FTE
CITY-NEAR CSI 1,179 FTE
CITY-NEAR Vans Distribution Center - SFS 757 FTE
NAT-TCR Baltimore Wicomico 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR HTC Joliet 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR MTS Bertrand 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Thompson Trucking 4.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Lynchburg VA Yard 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Triangle Chemical Company -Sycamore, Georgia 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cameron & Associate 8 Hagen Construction, LLc 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Aurora Cooperative - Grand Island Agronomy 22 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.