Commercial and industrial machinery repair and maintenance services · Maine

A.C. Electric Corp. Auburn

Auburn, ME · ~28 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
2.7
Avg TCR
2.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

A.C. Electric Corp. Auburn runs at 129% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Commercial and industrial machinery repair and maintenance services workplace, earning a grade D.

A.C. Electric Corp. Auburn: 2.7 TCR = 129% of Commercial and industrial machinery repair and maintenance services BLS 2.1 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

A.C. Electric Corp. Auburn safety composite

A.C. Electric Corp. Auburn scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 13%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

37/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.7 per 100 workers

Safer than 50% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.68 per 100 workers

Safer than 13% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

A.C. Electric Corp. Auburn: 0.0 → 4.7 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 8.8 TCR · DART/TCR 1.73× in 2024

A.C. Electric Corp. Auburn's TCR rose 4.7 from 0.0 in 2020 to 4.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 8.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.73× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 811310 · Auburn, ME ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 2.7 · 129% of ind

  • DART 4.7 DART
  • RANK #6/12
  • PHOTO MacGregor - Hampton
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~28 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: MacGregor - Hampton (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Maine employers → · Look up another →

A.C. Electric Corp. Auburn in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows A.C. Electric Corp. Auburn averages 2.7 TCR (129% of the Commercial and industrial machinery repair and maintenance services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

A.C. Electric Corp. Auburn TCR series: 2020=0 · 2021=8.8 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=4.7 · BLS 2.1

Where A.C. Electric Corp. Auburn falls in its industry

2,560 Commercial and industrial mach establishments

Safer than 50% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Maine alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 12 Commercial and industrial mach employers in Maine.

A.C. Electric Corp. Auburn (28 employees, TCR 2.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate A.C. Electric Corp. Auburn
A.C. Electric Corp. Auburn (28 employees, TCR 2.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7

A.C. Electric Corp. Auburn has fewer employees than the Commercial and industrial machinery repa median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.7 4.7 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 8.8 0.0 2 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

811310 · ME · Auburn

2,560 Commercial and industrial machinery repair and maintenance services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 2,397 rated employers in Maine with headcount on file · 100 employers in Auburn, ME · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR MacGregor - Hampton 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Crown Lift Trucks Boise 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Compression Technologies and Services : SVC-New Orleans LA-USA 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Whiting Corporation 2.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE AMC - ME - Portland Service Center 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bangor Natural Gas Company 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Spang Builders, Inc. 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Chase Excavating Inc 28 FTE
CITY-NEAR John F Murphy Homes, Inc 807 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 1868 490 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1868 424 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pioneer Plastics - Auburn 411 FTE
NAT-TCR Tempe Production 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Sioux Corporation 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR MKS Klamath Falls 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Arlington Valley Farms 2.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Home2 Suites Atascadero 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE 5 Star Plumbing 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mercy Emergency Med Services Lebanon 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Palihotel Melrose 28 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.