Alpine skiing facilities with accommodations (i.e., ski resort) · Massachusetts

AC Hotel Boston North

Medford, MA · ~42 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.5
Avg TCR
3.0
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

AC Hotel Boston North runs at 183% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Alpine skiing facilities with accommodations (i.e., ski resort) workplace, earning a grade D.

AC Hotel Boston North: 5.5 TCR = 183% of Alpine skiing facilities with accommodations (i.e., ski resort) BLS 3.0 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

AC Hotel Boston North safety composite

AC Hotel Boston North scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 42%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

57/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 5.49 per 100 workers

Safer than 42% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−11.5

2016→2021

AC Hotel Boston North injury rate improved

AC Hotel Boston North's TCR fell 11.5 from 11.5 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2019 at 16.8 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=11.5 · 2017=4.7 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=16.8 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 721110 · Medford, MA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.5 · 183% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #121/204
  • PHOTO Strathallan Hotel
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 13 inj
  • SIZE ~42 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Strathallan Hotel (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Massachusetts employers → · Look up another →

AC Hotel Boston North in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows AC Hotel Boston North averages 5.5 TCR (183% of the Alpine skiing facilities with accommodations (i.e., ski resort) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

AC Hotel Boston North TCR series: 2016=11.5 · 2017=4.7 · 2018=0 · 2019=16.8 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · BLS 3.0

Where AC Hotel Boston North falls in its industry

9,342 Alpine skiing facilities with establishments

Safer than 42% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Massachusetts alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #121 safest of 204 Alpine skiing facilities with employers in Massachusetts.

AC Hotel Boston North (42 employees, TCR 5.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 4.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate AC Hotel Boston North
AC Hotel Boston North (42 employees, TCR 5.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 4.8

AC Hotel Boston North has fewer employees than the Alpine skiing facilities with accommodat median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 16.8 7.2 7 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 4.7 4.7 2 0 0
2016 11.5 5.7 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

721110 · MA · Medford

9,342 Alpine skiing facilities with accommodations (i.e., ski resort) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,108 rated employers in Massachusetts with headcount on file · 54 employers in Medford, MA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Strathallan Hotel 5.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Aloft Frisco 5.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sonesta Philadelphia 5.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Courtyard by Marriott - Laie 5.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Kendall 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE Liberty Utilities Anawan Street 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lendlease Boston 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mass Cabinets Inc. 42 FTE
CITY-NEAR Melrose Wakefield Hospital 1,232 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lawrence Memorial Hospital 584 FTE
CITY-NEAR Wegmans Medford 134 434 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bond Brothers, Inc. 414 FTE
NAT-TCR Southwest Landscape Inc 5.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Crozer Chester Medical Center 5.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Northlake TX Plant 5.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Manhattanville Houses 5.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Alaark Tooling and Automation 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE General Parts - Waukesha 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE O'Brien Steel Service - Wausau Division 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE TN.FRANK.11 - Ricoh Americas Holdings, Inc. 42 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.