Condominium, multifamily, construction general contractors · California

Accel Framing, Inc.

Alpine, CA · ~88 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
15.2
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Accel Framing, Inc. runs at 400% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Condominium, multifamily, construction general contractors workplace, earning a grade F.

Accel Framing, Inc.: 15.2 TCR = 400% of Condominium, multifamily, construction general contractors BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Accel Framing, Inc. safety composite

Accel Framing, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 5%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

18/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 15.19 per 100 workers

Safer than 5% of industry peers

DART rate
F 7.7 per 100 workers

Safer than 9% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−10.9

2017→2020

Accel Framing, Inc. injury rate improved

Accel Framing, Inc.'s TCR fell 10.9 from 22.4 in 2017 to 11.6 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2017 at 22.4 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0.51× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=22.4 · 2018=9.0 · 2019=17.8 · 2020=11.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236116 · Alpine, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 15.2 · 400% of ind

  • DART 7.7 DART
  • RANK #62/68
  • PHOTO 595 Dean St, Brookly…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 36 inj
  • SIZE ~88 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 595 Dean St, Brooklyn, N.Y. 11238 (0.2 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Accel Framing, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Accel Framing, Inc. averages 15.2 TCR (400% of the Condominium, multifamily, construction general contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Accel Framing, Inc. TCR series: 2017=22.4 · 2018=9 · 2019=17.8 · 2020=11.6 · BLS 3.8

Where Accel Framing, Inc. falls in its industry

410 Condominium, multifamily, cons establishments

Safer than 5% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #62 safest of 68 Condominium, multifamily, cons employers in California.

Accel Framing, Inc. (88 employees, TCR 15.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 2.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Accel Framing, Inc.
Accel Framing, Inc. (88 employees, TCR 15.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 2.6

Accel Framing, Inc. has more employees than the Condominium, multifamily, construction g median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 11.6 7.7 6 3 0
2019 17.8 14.6 11 0 0
2018 9.0 7.7 7 0 0
2017 22.4 11.2 12 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236116 · CA · Alpine

410 Condominium, multifamily, construction general contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 17 employers in Alpine, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 595 Dean St, Brooklyn, N.Y. 11238 15.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Todd Hackett Construction Co 15.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Artimus LLC 15.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Empire Door & Glass 14.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Neil Bassetti Farms, LLC 88 FTE
STATE-SIZE Espinosa 88 FTE
STATE-SIZE Shoei Foods USA, Inc. 88 FTE
STATE-SIZE Crown Hill Ranches Inc. 88 FTE
CITY-NEAR Viejas Casino 1,619 FTE
CITY-NEAR Viejas Casino and Resort 1,416 FTE
CITY-NEAR ABS-0029-0028-00704 FAC-00704-ALPINE-CA 112 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6962-ABS-0029-0028-00704 101 FTE
NAT-TCR Clark County Highway Department 15.2 TCR
NAT-TCR 204802-Lou-Martin Luther King Sta 15.2 TCR
NAT-TCR 410612-Berwick Po 15.2 TCR
NAT-TCR USG Rainer OR 15.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Hadco Metal Trading Headquarters 88 FTE
NAT-SIZE Salem Heating & Sheet Metal Inc. 88 FTE
NAT-SIZE Diversified Fluid Solutions 88 FTE
NAT-SIZE Coshocton Trucking 88 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.