Painting lines on highways, streets and bridges · New York

Accent Stripe, Inc.

Orchard Park, NY · ~50 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
3.9
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Accent Stripe, Inc. runs at 139% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Painting lines on highways, streets and bridges workplace, earning a grade D.

Accent Stripe, Inc.: 3.9 TCR = 139% of Painting lines on highways, streets and bridges BLS 2.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Accent Stripe, Inc. safety composite

Accent Stripe, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 53% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 39%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

43/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.88 per 100 workers

Safer than 39% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.87 per 100 workers

Safer than 39% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.9

2018→2024

Accent Stripe, Inc. injury rate improved

Accent Stripe, Inc.'s TCR fell 2.9 from 4.8 in 2018 to 1.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 6.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.48× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=4.8 · 2019=4.8 · 2020=1.6 · 2021=2.7 · 2022=6.3 · 2023=5.0 · 2024=1.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237310 · Orchard Park, NY ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 3.9 · 139% of ind

  • DART 1.9 DART
  • RANK #108/165
  • PHOTO CCI Companies Inc.
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 22 inj
  • SIZE ~50 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: CCI Companies Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Accent Stripe, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Accent Stripe, Inc. averages 3.9 TCR (139% of the Painting lines on highways, streets and bridges BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Accent Stripe, Inc. TCR series: 2018=4.8 · 2019=4.8 · 2020=1.6 · 2021=2.7 · 2022=6.3 · 2023=5 · 2024=1.9 · BLS 2.8

Where Accent Stripe, Inc. falls in its industry

4,078 Painting lines on highways, st establishments

Safer than 39% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #108 safest of 165 Painting lines on highways, st employers in New York.

Accent Stripe, Inc. (50 employees, TCR 3.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Accent Stripe, Inc.
Accent Stripe, Inc. (50 employees, TCR 3.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Accent Stripe, Inc. has fewer employees than the Painting lines on highways, streets and median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.9 1.9 2 0 0
2023 5.0 5.0 5 0 0
2022 6.3 6.3 5 0 0
2021 2.7 2.7 2 0 0
2020 1.6 1.6 1 0 0
2019 4.8 4.8 4 0 0
2018 4.8 4.8 3 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237310 · NY · Orchard Park

4,078 Painting lines on highways, streets and bridges employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 72 employers in Orchard Park, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR CCI Companies Inc. 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Barnett Contracting, Inc 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Morgan County Highway Department 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR New Line Services Inc. DBA Agate Asphalt 3.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Construction Group 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE Vacri Construction Corporation 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rifenburg Contracting Corporation 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lancaster Development, Inc. 50 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mission Systems Orchard Park 455 FTE
CITY-NEAR MSD ORCHARD PARK 448 FTE
CITY-NEAR McGard llc 437 FTE
CITY-NEAR 10 Cobham 420 FTE
NAT-TCR 40275 Capstone Schnucks Markets St Louis 3.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Wil Fischer Distributing 3.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Franciscan Health Mooresville 3.9 TCR
NAT-TCR First Student 3.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Discovery Wall Systems, Inc. 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Broadcom Innovation Cafe 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE Innovative Casting Technologies, Inc 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Lac Harbor Expansion 50 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.