Skilled nursing facilities · Illinois

Accolade Healthcare of Paxton Senior Living

Paxton, IL · ~85 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
18.9
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Accolade Healthcare of Paxton Senior Living runs at 291% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Skilled nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Accolade Healthcare of Paxton Senior Living: 18.9 TCR = 291% of Skilled nursing facilities BLS 6.5 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Accolade Healthcare of Paxton Senior Living safety composite

Accolade Healthcare of Paxton Senior Living scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 3%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

16/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 18.93 per 100 workers

Safer than 6% of industry peers

DART rate
F 29.77 per 100 workers

Safer than 3% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Accolade Healthcare of Paxton Senior Living: 10.8 → 29.8 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 56.0 TCR · DART/TCR 1.57× in 2024

Accolade Healthcare of Paxton Senior Living's TCR rose 19.0 from 10.8 in 2019 to 29.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 56.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.57× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Paxton, IL ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 18.9 · 291% of ind

  • DART 29.8 DART
  • RANK #798/857
  • PHOTO Rose Haven
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 34 inj
  • SIZE ~85 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Rose Haven (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Illinois employers → · Look up another →

Accolade Healthcare of Paxton Senior Living in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Accolade Healthcare of Paxton Senior Living averages 18.9 TCR (291% of the Skilled nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Accolade Healthcare of Paxton Senior Living TCR series: 2019=10.8 · 2020=4.5 · 2021=56 · 2022=51 · 2023=30.6 · 2024=29.8 · BLS 6.5

Where Accolade Healthcare of Paxton Senior Living falls in its industry

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities establishments

Safer than 6% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Illinois alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #798 safest of 857 Skilled nursing facilities employers in Illinois.

Accolade Healthcare of Paxton Senior Living (85 employees, TCR 18.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Accolade Healthcare of Paxton Senior Living
Accolade Healthcare of Paxton Senior Living (85 employees, TCR 18.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Accolade Healthcare of Paxton Senior Living has fewer employees than the Skilled nursing facilities median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 29.8 29.8 2 18 0
2023 30.6 22.5 4 11 0
2022 51.0 45.7 5 24 0
2021 56.0 42.0 13 11 0
2020 4.5 0.8 5 23 0
2019 10.8 10.8 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · IL · Paxton

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,804 rated employers in Illinois with headcount on file · 13 employers in Paxton, IL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Rose Haven 18.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Estates of Shorewood 18.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Generations at Elmwood Park, LLC 18.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Columbia Manor care center 18.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Atkinson 85 FTE
STATE-SIZE DuPont Pioneer Utica UTI1 85 FTE
STATE-SIZE Monmouth, IL 85 FTE
STATE-SIZE Newton Power Station 85 FTE
CITY-NEAR Paxton-Buckley-Loda Community Unit School District No. 10 257 FTE
CITY-NEAR Accolade Healthcare of Paxton on Pells 121 FTE
CITY-NEAR Colmac Coil Midwest, Inc. 120 FTE
CITY-NEAR Heartland Health Care Center Paxton 116 FTE
NAT-TCR Station 5: Lake 18.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Water Department 18.9 TCR
NAT-TCR The Palms of Mount Pleasant 18.9 TCR
NAT-TCR 5472-NAI-0033-0033-00628 18.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE ITW Graphics 85 FTE
NAT-SIZE Balfour Kentucky Graphics 85 FTE
NAT-SIZE Billings Clinic Broadwater 85 FTE
NAT-SIZE 346 - Midland 85 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.