Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) · California

ACI Jet Maintenance

San Luis Obispo, CA · ~53 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
12.4
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

ACI Jet Maintenance runs at 275% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) workplace, earning a grade F.

ACI Jet Maintenance: 12.4 TCR = 275% of Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) BLS 4.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

ACI Jet Maintenance safety composite

ACI Jet Maintenance scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 81% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 3%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

42/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 12.39 per 100 workers

Safer than 3% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.1

2022→2024

ACI Jet Maintenance injury rate improved

ACI Jet Maintenance's TCR fell 5.1 from 11.5 in 2022 to 6.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 19.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=11.5 · 2023=19.2 · 2024=6.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 488190 · San Luis Obispo, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 12.4 · 275% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #113/120
  • PHOTO LAX
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~53 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: LAX (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

ACI Jet Maintenance in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows ACI Jet Maintenance averages 12.4 TCR (275% of the Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

ACI Jet Maintenance TCR series: 2022=11.5 · 2023=19.2 · 2024=6.4 · BLS 4.5

Where ACI Jet Maintenance falls in its industry

992 Aircraft maintenance and repai establishments

Safer than 3% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #113 safest of 120 Aircraft maintenance and repai employers in California.

ACI Jet Maintenance (53 employees, TCR 12.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate ACI Jet Maintenance
ACI Jet Maintenance (53 employees, TCR 12.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 3.2

ACI Jet Maintenance has fewer employees than the Aircraft maintenance and repair services median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 6.4 0.0 4 0 0
2023 19.2 9.6 5 5 0
2022 11.5 7.7 2 4 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

488190 · CA · San Luis Obispo

992 Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 177 employers in San Luis Obispo, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR LAX 12.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR ORD-GH 12.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR FW American Aero Operating Company 12.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Araina Aviation 12.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE P-R Farms 53 FTE
STATE-SIZE LRC LABOR SERVICES INC 53 FTE
STATE-SIZE Acemi Nursery 53 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ball Tagawa Growers 53 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bella Vista Transitional Care Center 8,119 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Men's Colony - San Luis Obispo 1,599 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Men's Colony 1,482 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 279 946 FTE
NAT-TCR New River Valley Regional Jail 12.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Creekside 12.4 TCR
NAT-TCR TX ST Lair 12.4 TCR
NAT-TCR 0758 - Eastchase 12.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Genesis Aviation Inc 53 FTE
NAT-SIZE Shoreline Growers 53 FTE
NAT-SIZE CHAE Inc. 53 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dalton Industries 53 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.